• LazyBaby@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “I don’t care [if people loathe me]” who do you think you’re foolin’ lol

  • Doug@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Credit where it’s due,” shut the fuck up you fucking fascist piece of shit. Goddamn I hate this man. This man can kick rocks and push daisies.

  • corbindallas@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    12 hours ago

    this bitchass can just lie, or say anything he wants, nothing happens. no repercussions, nothing. why does he even struggle?

    just say whatever is expedient for you. we hate you. and wosh you a slow death by cancer regardless of what u say

    eugenic loving nazi queen

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We’re only about halfway through Act 2. We’re still in the middle of the story, and there is a lot yet to be written.

  • BaraCoded@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    14 hours ago

    How is that mediocre nazi cunt still getting media coverage when he should be treated like he’s never existed?Men like that don’t coil when they’re hated. They melt when they’re ignored.

      • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Thats just celebrity culture. Thats global. We all pay too much attention to ppl who ultimately dont matter/dont deserve it

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Caring what one the richest people in the world wants/says is only partially celebrity culture.

          He is directly responsible for significant portions of our country’s space program and has personally altered our government’s structure and spending, resulting in at least thousands of deaths, so far.

          Pretending his thinking is as inconsequential and ignorable as any other moronic Nazi on Twitter is about as dumb as worshipping him.

        • Eh-I@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Thats just celebrity culture.

          What kind of weak shit is this. We’re talking about Nazis and eugenics and you come up with ‘boys will be boys it’s our fault for not looking away’

  • plateee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Musk insisted backyard tomatoes weren’t as good as those you can buy from the store, but people still do it anyway.

    Spoken like a man who has never grown tomatoes at home.

    I hated tomatoes until I ate a home grown Black Krim sandwich. Now there’s the added benefit that I know it’s not covered in salmonella or diarrhea parasites.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Can bet he doesn’t even knows how the inside of a store looks like, neither how a stores tomato tates like. His personal chef must source them from an specialty farm or even grow them itself without Musk even knowing about.

    • PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Because everything he says, no matter how trivial, is wrong. The man is incapable of being correct about anything.

      • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        He’s correct about The Culture being an amazing vision of how humanity’s future could look like. He’s absolutely off his rocker about how to get there

        The Culture IS “fully automated luxury queer space communism”, that’s just a straight-up summary of it. In The Culture:

        • it’s communism. There’s not even money.
        • everyone can “gland” drugs for pleasure, performance or to change their sex. How the fuck does that match Musk’s anti-trans shit?
        • diversity permeates everything; obviously internally, but also externally, as they try to get along with everyone who isn’t a galactic imperialist threat. How the hell does that match Musk’s xenophobia?

        It’s weird how Musk seems to basically be a tankie: he wants to achieve communism by any means necessary …

        • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          54 minutes ago

          Honestly it’s batshit that anyone can read The Culture and NOT understand the entire point is that The Culture persists and succeeds where others fail because of it’s values and diversity. Very much including those constant sex changes.

          Hell, the Idiran war (for those not familiar, a horrible war that takes place in the first book and the rest of the books in various ways deal with the fallout and trauma from it) is entirely about fighting a jingoistic, imperialist force before they gather enough strength to inevitably destroy the culture.

          This tells me that either Elon has never actually read them, or that he’s a moron.

          Probably both.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      My neice apparently “hated” tomatos until she tried a cherry from my greenhouse. She ate six of them and every time she came over patted the outside of the greenhouse singing “mato mato mato please”

      Most store sold tomatoes aren’t allowed to ripen on their own and their flavours are totally messed up as a result

      • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Most store sold tomatoes aren’t allowed to ripen on their own and their flavours are totally messed up as a result

        This is what many people need to learn and it spies to many varieties of fruit. Most fruits can’t ripen after being picked. They just soften and rot.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, home grown actually have flavour. The shit you buy in supermarkets mostly just tastes of water because it’s been harvested too early and shipped halfway round the world. I got some really yummy orange cherry plants going at the mo, can’t remember the variety but I’ve finally learned to get blight resistant varieties.

    • shiroininja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’ve never gotten anything of significance from my grows. A Handful of tomatoes, shrunken zucchini. I don’t know how people produce anything that makes a dent in their grocery bills without significant cost and time investment. Do you own land? Are you working like a farmer?

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Gardening is a skill like any other

        A skill that can be learned and practiced to gwt better at.

      • plateee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I use 15 gallon fabric planters successfully. Get a good indeterminate variety going and it’ll take off.

      • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        I live in a van on a disused carpark, so everything I grow has to be in pots. The key is regular feeding - I use an organic seaweed extract. Comfrey tea is good if you don’t want to spend money, fuckin stinks tho.

        Edit - eating some of my tomatoes right now, actually, with a bit of cheese. Yummy!

      • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’m not good at it by any means, but it’s a process and it gets easier. I am also not at the point where it could save me money after year 1, but Ive learned and I can see it. The most important steps for me… First step, wait for snow and buy a greenhouse when it’s super cheap, you will want bigger than you think. Greenhouses can also get too hot, figure out a plan for that. Second step, buy seeds for plants farmers actually grow in your climate not just the ones in the store. There are more varieties of individual plants than expected and ones bred for your climate will grow drastically better.

  • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Just to bring some facts in here:

    Musk, in a post on X on Sunday, claimed those who say DOGE’s USAID cuts resulted in deaths “cannot cite a single name of someone who died out of the ‘millions’ they falsely claim have died. Not a single name!” New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, who last year identified specific people he says died after USAID-backed services were disrupted, quickly responded with the names of four he said died because of the cuts, including an 8-year-old girl, and suggested the world’s richest person travel to Africa with him to “talk to these moms and dads, and you’ll see the dying children themselves.” In another post late on Monday, responding to a separate response from Kristof, Musk called Kristof “an utter piece of s— and a liar.”

    A study published in March 2025 found the loss of aid funding for children facing malnutrition in low- and middle-income countries would cut off 1 million children from treatment, potentially resulting in 163,000 child deaths each year. Another study published in the Lancet in July 2025 found the funding cuts could cause the deaths of more than 4.5 million children and more than 14 million total deaths by 2030. Kristof, citing data from the Center for Global Development, found that more than 1.6 million people could die within a year without American foreign aid for HIV prevention and treatment. A tracker co-created by Boston University professor Brooke Nichols projected more than 780,000 deaths caused by the cuts, roughly 518,000 of which are children, after cuts to treatment for malaria, tuberculosis, HIV and pneumonia, among others.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2026/07/01/musk-escalates-unproven-usaid-claims-in-fiery-posts-as-studies-link-doge-cuts-to-child-deaths/

    So he knows the names of some people he is responsible for their death. And studies show that his action will kill several hundred thousand people.

  • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Narrator: “But he did care. He cared a lot. In fact, he was desperate for people to love him, and proclaim him the best person in the history of humanity, in any field of endeavour. Desperate”.

  • bandanawearingbanana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    When he was asked about Muslims he said “If people are coming to a country with anitethical views, I am against that.”

    Lol, like him supporting far-right European parties? Their views surely are anitethical to democracy and not spying for foreign entities.

    Also, I can’t find the whole interview only larger snippets on Youtube.

  • sculptor0725@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    His ideas aren’t contradictory, they make perfect sense. He’s a Nazi, in the most literal sense of the word. He wants socialism for White people, endless abundance for the chosen few and endless suffering for anyone else.

    • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      He grew up in a society where this shit was the norm. His shitty Nazi family moved to South Africa from Canada so they could relish living in a white ethno-state.

  • BruisedMoose@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Musk said he wanted a Star Trek version of the future

    Oh cool! So like a place where we make a conscious effort to learn and understand people and cultures we don’t know anything about? And we try to treat them all with respect and let them have a seat at the table? That’s so awes… What? That’s not what he meant?

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    17 hours ago

    He suggested that everyone read Iain Banks for a vision of the future, and Beddoes pointed out that Banks was a socialist. Musk insisted he wasn’t.

    Criticizing a thing as socialism when it’s actually capitalism. Describing a socialist utopia and insisting it’s not socialism. This isn’t a thing unique to Musk. Why are people like this?

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      People like Musk are so high from huffing their own farts, they can’t even conceive of the possibility that they might be wrong.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      A simplified and opinionated explanation:

      During the red scare, the boomers were programmed to be scared of anything remotely communist. The middle class was allowed to exist as 'muricas bling mostly to distract from the societal improvements theorized by socialist philosophers. In the 50s in America, they gave us just enough for people to shut up and try to be happy for 50 years while the underlying systems were being broken even worse than before. Some people are particularly susceptible to this and would trade their freedom for a tide pod, a stick of gum and a pocket constitution while rabidly denouncing socialists (even those who advocate for the benefit and fair treatment of non-socialists and socialists alike). Socialism is painted with the brush of it’s biggest failures; capitalism is only painted from the angles that make it look good and hide it’s collateral fallout.

      Tl:Dr 50+ years of social conditioning and societal sculpting done to ensure scary communists from the 1940s and 50s don’t call you comrade.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      socialist utopia

      As someone who has read all the books in Culture series I would (and will if provoked) argue that, as most books about utopias, it’s actually describing a dystopia. No idea if it’s socialist or not, but in the society Banks is describing people are reduced to the role of pets, not equal partners of AI.

      • stom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Not really, human agents are still highly valued, hence the combo of human+drone team. If what you said was correct then they’re have just used avatars for everything. Djan Seriy Anaplian for example was a fucking badass.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yes really.

          1. Straight out in the first book Culture is shown as the bad guy, civilization that is not alive and has to be destroyed. It wins eventually but the point stands: Culture kind of like the Borg, absorbing humanoid species and growing without limits.

          2. No other civilization relies on AI as much. In Hydrogen Sonata you have good description of other civilization that uses digital constructs that are still based on humans, not pure AI. There’s clear distinction between AI controlled Culture and other civilizations. Why other civilizations don’t use AI as much? Because they don’t want be controlled by it.

          3. It’s clear AI likes to use people so it manipulates them to do what it wants. Player of Games is clear example of that. In State of the Art AI straight out assassinates a guy who doesn’t want to follow its orders.

          4. In State of the Art Culture is also shows as sterile and boring. Everyone behaves because they don’t have a choice, their actions are meaningless, they don’t really control or anything or advance the civilization.

          5. People have more of a sentimental value for AI. It does recognize human as intelligent the same way we recognize that animals are alive. People are sure taken care of but everything is run by AI. People are just pets.

          • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Straight out in the first book Culture is shown as the bad guy, civilization that is not alive and has to be destroyed. It wins eventually but the point stands: Culture kind of like the Borg, absorbing humanoid species and growing without limits.

            No, not really. Very intentionally by Banks, we see the Culture through the eyes of Bora in the first book. Bora hates the Culture, for his own ideological reasons. He believes that the Culture makes people soft and complacent and lacking agency, but we’re shown in the book how he’s wrong.

            Further, he allies with the Idirans - a strictly worse civilization: brutal, imperialist, religious zealots who squash the civilizations they capture below their feet, breeding and dumbing them down to serve them.

            The Culture is absolutely nothing like the Borg. The Borg forcefully concquer unwilling participants and suppress their individuality to force them into essentially slave labor.

            The Culture grows by the merit of people wanting to join it. No-one is forced to. Their ideals are just something resonating with people. Individuals’ needs are fully taken care of, but in complete opposite of the Borg, it’s to enable each member to fully flourish and live their life to their own aspirations, free from material desperations.

            I’m sorry, but what you originally wrote is exactly something that would come out of Bora’s mouth, and is just as wrong.

            (Btw Banks has talked about how he wanted to first show the Culture through the lens of an enemy, and then dismantle that distorted view.)

            No other civilization relies on AI as much. In Hydrogen Sonata you have good description of other civilization that uses digital constructs that are still based on humans, not pure AI. There’s clear distinction between AI controlled Culture and other civilizations. Why other civilizations don’t use AI as much? Because they don’t want be controlled by it.

            True, but again, this is something that other civs say about the Culture, not literal reality. Humans, drones and Minds are not equally powerful, sure, not even close; but that there’s no (systemic! Stories sometimes focus on rogue individuals, be they human or machine!) abuse of this, that the Culture is as equitable as can reasonably be imagined, is one of its strengths.

            It’s clear AI likes to use people so it manipulates them to do what it wants. Player of Games is clear example of that. In State of the Art AI straight out assassinates a guy who doesn’t want to follow its orders.

            Yes, somewhat. The stories intentionally focus on the fringes of the Culture. (Plus, Gurgeh actively decides that he WANTS to get into Contact/SC, knowing that this sort of thing happens, and then is used as a pawn). Regarding the killings: this is part of accepting machine and human equality. If you would bind these superhuman Minds via Three Laws of Robotics or the like, then suddenly we have a class of oppressed machine beings.

            I think the main point here is: we focus on the interesting bits and outliers (as Banks himself said), and as I tried to describe above, this issue is not systemic. We see, what, 5 cases like this? In a galaxy of trillions.

            In State of the Art Culture is also shows as sterile and boring. Everyone behaves because they don’t have a choice, their actions are meaningless, they don’t really control or anything or advance the civilization.

            Somewhat true, but again: you’re mixing what a character expresses about their perception with literal reality. A character, for that matter, who already was on the fringe of the fringens, being an SC agent. It’s also heavily implied that he simply romanticizes earth. Earth is backwater, exciting, chaotic; but if he really just wanted “non-stagnant”, he could have kept his relative safety and went into any of the non-Culture, but alien-acquainted civs.

            And heavy, HEAVY disagree on the Culture being meaningless: this even is discussed in the books themselves! The Culture does, from time to time, debate its right to exist; why not sublime? And the answer is, because they’re doing measurable good.

            We also see the culture change pretty drastically between, say, Consider Phlebas and Player of Games.

            People have more of a sentimental value for AI. It does recognize human as intelligent the same way we recognize that animals are alive. People are sure taken care of but everything is run by AI. People are just pets.

            Once again, this is a sentiment expressed by some characters, not literal reality. However, I actually think it’s somewhat close to true. At least in the following sense:

            If Minds would stop caring about humanity tomorrow, then Culture citizens would be fucked, the same way your dog would be fucked if you stopped feeding it tomorrow.

            However, where the analogy breaks down is that Minds don’t cage, neuter, steal from the wild, or restrict humans and drones. They took over production, transport and so on not because they wanted to keep humans in check, but because to them it’s literally no bother; so why not? Seems like a nice thing to do! I.e. its altruism, and without strings attached.

            Note also that the “humans are just pets” argument is expressed multiple times by characters in a derisive way, but never shown to be the truth, and arguably the books show how and why it’s wrong.

            Banks and his characters do examine the Culture from various, critical perspectives, which is why I’m so confident to say: the Culture is a Utopia.

            (One we’ll never reach.)

    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      The Culture is described as a libertarian utopia (EDIT: libertarian socialist? I think I misremember. At least socialism as a word doesn’t appear), except that the habitat minds are benevolent and you have practically socialism because nothing costs anything. Not even land really because they can build as many orbitals as they want. They have zero laws. You can also see it as an anarchist utopia. You have no market and no capitalism. Basically once you have AGI and full abundance, economic systems like capitalism/socialism don’t mean anything any more.

      Only ethics matter then, which Musk is incapable of because he’s a malignant narcissist. And he has been actively trying to create a malignant (anti-woke) AI.

      • FatCrab@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The Culture is some sort of quasi-anarchic non-capitalist thing, though it’s hard to say for sure. It certainly is not capitalist, though, as the role of profitable production is not to increase the capital of those who already have it. Nothing is really socialized, though, and private property does seem to exist, so I don’t know that I would consider the Culture socialist or even communist. Maybe some sort of anarchic post-communist utopia.

        In any case, Musk is a fucking idiot. Just a genuinely foolish person. And, like, yeah, Banks himself was a socialist.

        • socsa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Right it would be called revisionist. The idea that socialism is one rigid set of prescriptive ideals is a misconception, at least to most political scientists. There are of course Orthodox Marxists, but nobody really takes them seriously outside of their little internet fiefdoms. For most other political philosophers, socialism is a range of beliefs and practices loosely tied together by the desire for, or belief in a post capitalist world. How you get there and what it exactly looks like is the topic of much debate, to the point where it usually feels counterproductive to even get tied up in labels. This “proper noun” philosophy is a good way to get oriented out of the gate, but the real work comes in how those labels get reduced to first principles more than the labels themselves.

  • amos@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I think we should collectively, the whole society, bully this guy to suicide.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Just goes to show that billionaires have no taste. Whether it is home-grown versus store bought tomatoes or gluing gold spray-painted plastic to the walls, their lack of aesthetic is showing.

    • shiroininja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I really don’t notice a difference between home grown or store bought. But I really think it depends on the store and season you’re buying from. If it’s actually in season, supplies are more local and fresh. If you’re buying a tomato in February, of course it is going to be awful, it’s being shipped thousands of miles. And you can’t grow your own tomatoes in February unless it’s in your house or a green house (which is a luxury I’ve never even met someone I knew had. You own a whole other building, on property? You own property in which you can fit another building?!)

      Apples are the worst offenders, if you’re buying apples in spring, you’re buying last year’s harvest.

      • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I grow my own tomatoes. In my area the difference between the homegrown and storebought is night and day (with the homegrown ones being way better). I understand how it could be regional though.