• KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    MS DOS 6.6 for me - I enjoy the power of a 286 processor and much smaller instruction sets.

    :O

  • lmuel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I know it’s not exactly the point of the article but for a lot of things, I reckon a good amount of ‘innovation’ was pretty pointless. I personally don’t think I ever needed anything that Office 2003 can’t do… (Of course I don’t use any MS office to begin with but you get the point)

    • Twitchy1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Everything beyond the Dewey decimal system is/was pretty unnecessary, imo. We created a way to organize and “quickly” locate information stored in a physical format.

      The near complete lack of manual labor has had many long reaching effects on society.

      I type this on my brand new flagship phone…

    • gamer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’ve been trying tk get family to switch to Linux, but some are irrationally attached to MS Word. I wonder if Office 2003 will run in Wine?

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    The elevator was running Windows XP.

    Clearly a extreme case of overengineering. An elevator has no business running more than a few microcontrollers.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s what I think too. And then I see “Their systems are built into everything around us”, which basically only applies to PCs and laptops. What is built into pretty much everything around us is GnuLinux.

        • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Yes? That is not that unusual and it is mentioned in the third sentence of the article.

          As I rode up to the 14th floor, my eyes were drawn to a screen built into the side of the lift.

            • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 hours ago

              We are far away from the release of the Raspberry Pi if that screen is running an early version of Windows CE. Putting a PC in the elevator to drive the screen was probably the most cost effective solution.

                • jj4211@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  There’s not particularly good reason to stop doing it in that scenario either.

                  You have an offline technology stack in that elevator that has been doing the job correctly for 20 years. Why take on the expense and risk of changing things that aren’t currently broken?

                  It would be crazy if you are building new to resort to that stack, but for an established elevator, why bother?

                  Same for some old oscilloscopes at work. I’m not crazy about the choice but I can hardly suggest it would be practical to change it while the oscilloscopes still do their function.

                  I would say it’s a problem if the stack is online, but if it is self contained, the age of the software doesn’t make it a problem in and out itself.

                • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  New ones probably use something newer. The 20 year old elevator in a hospital will only be upgraded if something breaks.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    there’s a word for those people: awesome

    windows xp was peak; running anything before xp is legendary

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Idk, it was horrendously insecure, would freeze a lot, and missing creature comforts like window tiling.

      If they kept refining Win7 it would’ve been great.

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Idk, it was horrendously insecure, would freeze a lot, and missing creature comforts like window tiling.

        It was significantly more secure than it’s DOS-based predecessor of the time, Windows ME (that’s a whole other rabbit hole; if you wanna talk insecure and buggy as fuck - look no further). That’s what people don’t realize, they look at the past through a modern lens. You gotta look at it from the time it was released. There’s a reason mainstream consumer-focused Windows editions dropped DOS and moved to the NT kernel. XP was the first real consuner version of Windows based on XP.

        If they kept refining Win7 it would’ve been great.

        They did, it was called “Windows 8” and Nobody liked it.

        • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 minutes ago

          But this article is talking about people running Windows 7 today, so comparing current actions through a modern lens is entirely valid

    • eleitl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I ran Linux 1994ish. Amiga OS before. Amstrad CPC 464 before. A friend ran Sinclair ZX-80, that was the first system I had access to.

      • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        aside from radio shack and texas instruments that i used at camp, i think i was sadly too young to do anything but windows 3.1 :( our first computer was a tandy sensation in the early 90s and i didn’t really play with linux until maybe the mid 2000s

        except for playing with apple IIe and radio shack computers through school and camp, that is.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “stuck” more like happy to not have to deal with the last 15-ish years of microsoft ruining everything they previously excelled at.

    • CherryBullets@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They lost me when they removed the start button on the left side of the taskbar in version 8.1 (I think it was) to… Be cool with the kids (I think 8.1 was supposed to be touch screen friendly)? I don’t even know, but I went back to Windows 7 for a long while.

      The backlash with the start button was so huge that they put it back on the taskbar in Windows 10 (at least mine has it and is the reason I got Windows 10). I’m currently refusing to update to Windows 11, because it apparently crashes when playing certain video games and I’m not about to have the other trash bugs that come with it, which I’ve been seeing posted on Microsoft help forums when I search for Windows 10 related questions. Fuck that noise, I don’t want to deal with it.

      • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        They seemingly wanted to design the entire interface around touchscreen 2-in-1s. If you went in a Microsoft store around the time windows 8 came out, they were leaning really hard into the 2-in-1s. I got a surface pro 3 at that time that I used to take handwritten notes in school, and the windows 8 interface was honestly awesome with that use case. On my desktop PC, though, I held out updating from 7 until windows 10.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 minutes ago

        Windows 8 removed the start button, 8.1 brought back most all of the “legacy” UI features (which still persist today).

  • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Why not? Still using Windows 7 on one of my ThinkPads. It’s a solid system, if you know what you’re doing and how to use is safely.

    • gamer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      and how to use is safely.

      Such as by disconnecting the ethernet and power cables

      • Gibibit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        I wouldn’t be surprised if there are a bumper crop of level 10 CVEs in the latest and “greatest” version of Windows 7 that will never get patched. Unless you have one of those special enterprise licenses that they keep updating.

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I had a 486DX running DOS for writing and editing CAM programs for CNC mills, lathes, pipe bender, and a laser cutter. And for funsies, an even older Macintosh that booted from a 5 1/4" floppy that ran a CMM, (co-ordinate measuring machine). And the software for the CMM ran from another 5 1/4" floppy.

    This was about 2017 before I retired as a toolmaker.

  • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m visiting my parents in my home country after many years of not being there. I’m hoping my dad’s old pentium 2 laptop is still around.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      22 hours ago

      My assumption would be that the display is not related to operating the elevator, but rather displaying information about businesses on the respective floors. I’ve seen those a fair few times, and since they run on isolated networks or even fully local, there’s little risk.

    • Thrawne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Frighteningly, i worked as an admin at a hospitality wifi business that ran a windows box for dhcp duty. I would have to go o site, in the middle of the night, down to the basement of this hotel, and reboot the damn thing. It would die almost every week. Replaced with a linux server and never heard from them again.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was tearing out ancient infrastructure for a new office and my eye kept going to a rectangular square box on the wall. Finally realized it was a PC! The cause of death was clear, PSU fan died, killed itself from heat. It was a form factor I had never seen, but standard nonetheless. It was running an answering machine system in DOS, still worked! Such a rare machine I’ve only found a single reference on the web and a single video about it. 1999, 486XS (I know, would kill for a DX, it’s soldered on), upgraded from 2x 2MB SIMMs to a whopping 2x 64MB SIMMs. Imagine what that would have cost in the day!

    LONG story, but I got it running Windows 95b. 3.1 was just too much challenge to get it networked and happy. Much pain was removed when I got a USB floppy emulator. Can’t do jack without a floppy! Broke the network card drivers, need to start over. Had it running Doom with a legit SoundBlaster card and could RDP into over the network.

    It was an amazing journey getting it all together and updated. Most of that knowledge is gone from the internet, and I sure don’t remember all the tricks. Going to be my first token ring machine! LOL, had to get parts from Romania and trash cans.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Man, remember when people used to break into offices to steal the RAM?

      My work experience in around 1995 was spent at a local computer firm.

      At one point a group of men in balaclavas showed up, the boss stopped playing Doom long enough to cover the security camera and hand over a bunch of crumpled banknotes, and I was handed this pile of SIMMs to put in a test rig to make sure they were OK to sell.

      I also had to straighten the pins on used/stolen 486 CPUs, and pretty sure at one point was taken to break into a warehouse. There was certainly nobody else in the whole building, and we loaded the van with a bunch of cheap looking boxes before taking them back to HQ.

      The boss was also banging a girl in my class, which in later years I learned makes him a paedo. Times sure were simpler in 1995.

    • Drasglaf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If you ever see yourself in the need of information about the DOS era again, Vogons is the place to go IMHO.

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The cause of death was clear, PSU fan died, killed itself from heat.

      PSU: “Release…me…from this mockery called life”

  • Pistcow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mail sorter for a company I worked for uses Windows 3.1.

    My parents ancient HP from 1997, I sold the motherboard with popped capacitors for $250. I informed the buyer of the condition and he said he didn’t care, he’d fix it, but they needed it for some legacy hardware their company functioned on.

    • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      😂 🤣

      Similarly, my Dad ran his medical office on Win98 until he died (2011).

      Of course, he had no support for OS or the medical office software other than himself (and me).

      Had a supplier of inexpensive old machines/parts.

      All cause he refused to pay the $5k required to upgrade the medical office software that ran on those machines. 🤷‍♂️

      • vaionko@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        My dad’s company still runs software from 2002 for recording sales and sending bills. Runs fine on Windows 10 surprisingly

  • Fox@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 day ago

    At my old workplace, there was numerous XP machines still going. They were running old machine equipment, and basically served as a controller for the entire machine.

    As it turns out, it was cheaper to keep these XP stations, instead of buying a completely new Hydrolic press, or whatever it was running, which cost several hundred of thousands of dollars.

    One day one of these computers stopped working, and we immediately tried to get the software to work on a brand new W10 replacement. Took us a week of drivers hell, until we eventually went to the basement, found an exact replica, and swapped the HDD over.

    The company, making these heavy machineries, went bankrupt in the early 2000s, and there was literally no way of getting the software to run on anything besides that original box.

    • undrwater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d like a law that software / hardware companies who file for bankruptcies must release the source / files for their tech to an open source repository.

      • Broken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I like that idea bit it’ll never fly. That software is an asset. A bankrupt company needs every asset to be sold to cover as much percentage of their debt to their vendors as possible. I’ve been in a company that went bankrupt and I’ve been the vendor of a company that went bankrupt. Being the vendor was the harder experience.

        • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’m sure it makes the bean counters happier to have another asset valued at X amount, but in practice the software will just be locked in some vault where it won’t do anyone any good.

          Its an instance where the number on the screen doesn’t actually correspond to any useful economic activity.

      • guy_threepwood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        If you are a big company there are often ESCROW agreements for things like this. I have encountered the “data dumps” from time to time and whilst it’s “better” it’s not ideal. Half finished documentarian, virtual machines of mis-configured OS installs… it’s almost as if it was just a straight copy of the development environment as it was just as they made the final version of the software…

        But it’s better than nothing.

        Main issue I can see with this forcing open source would be libraries and frameworks licensed from others who would likely still be in business and wouldn’t agree to those parts becoming open sourced. See also WinAMP https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/16/opensourcing_of_winamp_goes_badly/

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        That idea often comes up in these discussions and I’ve never really had an argument against. Best I got is that parts of that software may have moved to more modern stuff that was purchased by another company. But that’s a damned thin excuse not to implement this.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yup. Take backups, have spares, and keep it off the Internet and it’ll work just fine.

      Pro tip, you can get IDE to CF adapters if you want to put an SSD in those old machines to really see them fly. Just be aware that they don’t have nearly as good write durability as a real SSD, so keep write heavy operations on the HDD.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can get industrial grade CF cards that use SLC memory. They have much better write endurance than normal CF cards.

    • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      There’s still things like that on my workplace today. I think there’s some older, rarely used CNC with Win98 on the controller. We just keep spares around when they break, but that’s cheaper than replacing the whole machinery. Also there’s some XP stations running software for an industrial machine which would cost quarter of a million to replace. Some of those need access to network drives and such but they live in a strictly isolated VLAN.

      And, as far as I’ve told at least, there was no option at any point to upgrade just the computers on those things. It’s always the whole assembly line or whatever they’re connected to. There’s not many companies willing to throw hundreds of thousands every 3-5 years to replace perfectly working equipment.

      • Fox@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s funny, because this scenario actually happened in our CNC hall.

        The guys over there were working with SolidWorks and Mastercam. I never really got too involved with their work, other than installing the software remotely for them.

        It could very well have been a CNC machine that this procedure was about. I just know that they had all kinds of equipment in there, along with a hydrolic press, which peaked my interest the most because of a certain Finnish youtuber haha.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        there’s some older, rarely used CNC

        Me over here with a dirty mind 100% positive that I’m not using “CNC” the same way you are. I don’t know what your way means, but my way is more fun.

        • Badabinski@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          CNC—computer numerical control, where a computer makes the cutty/smushy/printy parts move through meatspace.

        • Badabinski@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          CNC—computer numerical control, where a computer makes the cutty/smushy/printy parts move through meatspace.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I set up a 32 bit Windows 7 VM so my dad could keep using his old drawing program that was built for Windows 3.11.

      It was the last version of Windows to support 3.11 compabillity.

      Works well.

      • jdnewmil@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just a note: Windows software for controlling hardware is highly likely to assume a)direct access to the hardware (sometimes mediated thorough ancient APIs and assuming the existence of defunct expansion slots) and b) assume meatspace time can be counted using OS timing ticks (which get stretched out as modern VMs timeshare with other processes underneath the virtulized hardware). It is awfully tough to replace them sometimes.

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, I suspect you gotta do something similar to what McLaren did when the special mid 90s computer they used for the F1 got too hard to replace as they broke, they built a new computer interface that was compatible with modern computers and allowed them to interface with the car

    • muusemuuse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are third parties that create new software for old industrial machines for this exact reason.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, and as long as these things never touch the internet, there really isn’t an issue.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Stuck or preferred choice?

    Trapped using software they needed to buy once, vs rent?

    • Lorem Ipsum dolor sit amet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yes, stuck. There are enourmous problems with different institutions having to use ancient PCs because the software doesn’t work on modern ones, be they electron microscopes, hospitals or industrial machinery, causing e.g. enourmous security issues. This is one of the most important reasons why FOSS and why making FOSS software mandatory in government contracts is so important.

      Also how come people can’t read the fucking article before commenting?

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m a bit depressed that I finally need to upgrade my last windows 7 machine. It looks like it’s 10 for me now :-(