• zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I would never give Microsoft money for their shitty subscription, so it is kind of fun for me.

  • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I remember when GamePass was first announced and everybody lauded Microsoft for being “pro-consumer” and outright cheered when they started buying up independent studios.

    I remember being downvoted to oblivion for pointing out the very obvious 5 year plan for GP and the fact that it would go… exactly the way it’s currently going.

    • sadfitzy@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep. Same thing with netflix.

      The average consumer is a moron, so their complacency is irrelevant in determining what’s a good deal.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I never understood the praise at all. It’s literally turning DRM into a business model.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’ve been in the fuck subscriptions camp. Sony locking multiplayer behind PS+ was wha5 led me to dropping consoles as my primary gaming system, since I refused to pay for multiplayer.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t mind subscriptions for ongoing infrastructure as much. My problem is with using a subscription to replace ownership.

        • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If they are charging to multiplayer why wouldn’t they want to replace ownership too so they get money every month.

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Platform infrastructure like PSN costs an inordinate amount of money. People owning games they paid for does not cost you any money.you already made your money back by selling them the ownership.

            • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sounds like excuses when PS3 and Nintendo Wii, WiiU, and Nintendo DS had free multiplayer and it was after Sony decided to start charging Nintendo also jumped onboard because they saw peope like you were easy to take their money.

              I don’t even know why you’d have a problem with Xbox charging more for their subscription when you already argue for paid online.

              • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Yes, charging customers for a product that costs you money to maintain is an excuse, and a valid one. Sony and Nintendo were giving away an expensive service for free to the user. It was generous, and a way to reduce friction with onboarding new users.

                They jumped on board because maintaining that infrastructure has become exponentially more expensive to maintain today than it was 20 years ago.

                I don’t even know why you’d have a problem with Xbox charging more for their subscription when you already argue for paid online.

                Because unlike paid user services, game ownership is not something that costs them any money. They aren’t recouping their costs for a service they provide, it’s just rentseeking.

                • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yeah I don’t buy it. Nintendo does free across multiple hardware then when they saw they were the only one decided they’d start taking money too, since it is in a companies nature to maximize profits exponentially.

                  And then there’s Steam. Also in the hardware business and hosting games and mods and a bunch of other services even Epic with their Fortnite money hasn’t matched. Yet online is free.

                  You just sound like a consumer who iust accepts whatever methods companies try to exploit consumers and defend as necessary. More a stockholder than a consumer.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      At the time, I predicted you were probably right - but it would still be a good value for the time that the price stayed low.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I feel like I responded to this exact comment on Reddit years ago saying the same. The thing people don’t realize, is subscriptions give you zero control of ownership and it’s always in the best interest of the corp to bait and switch.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        McDonald’s is the most clear cut example, although that’s ongoing

        There’s been countless little companies that sent themselves into death spirals with a price hike, but when they’re big their remains are pounced on, or they experience a slow decline before collapsing to a failed pivot

    • bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Part of the problem is that most of the people making these decisions have been seeing their incomes and net worth increase steadily over the past decade. They don’t truly understand their subscriber base.

      • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        But they do understand “charge what the market will bear”. It’s all about short term profit.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thanks for letting me know, I’ve been paying just for some spare OneDrive space but I think I’ll cut it if they’re raising the price

      • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        My boss showed me the article yesterday, but apparently it’s the old news from earlier this year. It went from 70 to 100 back in Feb.

        That’s still a giant increase from whatever you would have paid last year.

  • Talaraine@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’ve made very clear that they’re reducing functionality, dropping products including their gaming companies, and raising prices across the board to somehow come up with billions for AI. They no longer care about their customers or employees, only this holy grail quest for money that will evaporate. Dump Microsoft.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s something we don’t take lightly, and we’re listening to the feedback of players and the community to try to provide them with more of what they’re asking for.

    God they will never understand that we see right through their bullshit corpo-speak answers will they. Everything they just said is nothing. They don’t take it lightly. They are listening. They will try. There is nothing concrete in that wet paper towel of an answer.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So, if there had been no cancellations and their customers had just paid their bills without comment or criticism, they’d still have been telling us how terrible they felt about the whole thing?

    Bovine Excrement.

    • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, it will work out for them. They just made a 50% profit increase. I doubt if even 10% of subscribers cancel.

      It worked for Netflix, Disney+, Hulu… People just need to stop buying shit, but they won’t.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even though I personally never used it I was astonished at how quickly so many people blindly trusted it. What I’m more astonished with is how quickly Microsoft has managed to destroy that brand trust.