• mrmaplebar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Oh NOW you care about stealing intellectual property!

    Fuck off. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, AI assholes.

  • Craccoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I couldn’t care less. Just make cheaper products with near or on par performance and you’re okay in my book.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Samsung uses monopoly tactics and government support to bankrupt smaller companies and then raise prices. They’re scum.

    RAM is so important to the world economy that their patents should be made public.

  • Courtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    In a better world, all of these technologies that get stolen by various corpo espionage and reverse engineering teams would be freely shared with the world so everyone can benefit from them, and people not in the dev teams might have improvements they can suggest.

    But instead we have a bunch of rich adult children who would rather take the ball and go home because they don’t think they’ve recieved enough praise for bringing it, and wanting to charge everyone just to look at it.

    It’s not a great metaphor, but honestly dealing with companies and governments feels a lot like dealing with children you aren’t allowed to discipline or even talk sternly to because their parents have forbidden you from interfering.

      • ladicius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        You mean 40 years of delay for the destruction of our biosphere?

        I’d call that a win.

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          15 hours ago

          40 years of burning far more coal than necessary due to inefficient engines

          Whether the overall effect was positive or negative with respect to the biome, no clue

          • jdr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Yes, but also induced demand. More efficient engines means less coal per task, but more tasks, maybe so many more that total coal use increases.

            • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That’s why I said we don’t know the overall effect on the biome due to less efficient engines

              With how quickly we industrialized, my intuition is we were mining and burning it as fast as possible, but maybe more efficient engines could have let us mine and burn even more

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Let’s not forget that mega corpos benefit heavily from government subsidized R&D in universities, insert themselves within the R&D and claim innovation as their own.

      Tech is built on FOSS and private corporations act like they invented butter.

  • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    When companies are not able to produce enough to satisfy demand and are actively stopping selling to certain sectors and harming them, they should lose their patents. RAM companies are actively harming all of us by selling their products to the AI companies and leaving us all without RAM, so we should encourage alternatives.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      When companies are not able to produce enough to satisfy demand and are actively stopping selling to certain sectors and harming them, they should lose their patents.

      Except they stop selling to certain sectors because these sectors pay less. I am pretty sure that if a laptop maker ask to buy the RAM at a 50% higher price than AI companies, the RAM producer will happily sell to them.

      RAM companies are actively harming all of us by selling their products to the AI companies and leaving us all without RAM, so we should encourage alternatives.

      And how do you plan to keep these alternatives from selling to the higher bidder, which will probably be a AI company ?

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      So patents are stopping the whole market competition thing, like what how capitalism is supposed to work and all that.

      • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        21 hours ago

        There should be a ceiling with patents, where if you make 10x back of what it cost your r&d (or whatever 5x of your yearly revenue), the patent should just be considered expired no matter how much time passed.

        It should never be an infinite source of money.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Seems like a good idea, but would probably just result in Hollywood accounting so that they never actually make any profit on paper.

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Patents in the US only last 20 years on stuff like this, the problem is that lawyers are crafty. So they will patent the formula and then 20 years later the delivery method or something like that. Thus preventing generics for longer than they should be able to.

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Only way how capitalism works is that the rich are just becoming the richer by exploiting the poor(er).

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      OK, but the leak in the article seems to have been in 2016 when conditions were very different.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      19 hours ago

      We need to stop them from stealing 1 corporations IP, so tech corporations can continue making monopoly money off the entire human species stolen IP!

  • wedge@multiverse.soulism.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Guessing they won’t get much in the way of public sympathy given they’re bending consumers over the barrel. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.