FF2-NES, suffered from comparisons to the first FF. I personally think that’s an unfair comparison, though I will admit that visually the two games share a lot. That’s kinda where the comparison ends though. The gameplay was a considerable improvement, just allowing your characters to retarget on the fly was a huge improvement.
The other complaint I have heard is that it’s grindy, and that one is completely fair.
Final Fantasy II, though from what I talked with people, it suffers more from bad reputation than people actively playing it and not liking.
I enjoyed it on GBA
Arcane Labyrinth is fantastic. Adds much to the game, both in lore (which the base game barely has so it needed) and in challenge. 👌
NES 2 or SNES 2, which was actually 4?
This is my main issue with the early FF games. The numerical fiddling makes it impossible for me to follow which one the conversation is even about.
NES FFII.
FF2-NES, suffered from comparisons to the first FF. I personally think that’s an unfair comparison, though I will admit that visually the two games share a lot. That’s kinda where the comparison ends though. The gameplay was a considerable improvement, just allowing your characters to retarget on the fly was a huge improvement.
The other complaint I have heard is that it’s grindy, and that one is completely fair.