GitHub has been having enough outages lately that people are starting to ask whether it makes sense to look elsewhere.
Ever since Github got acquired by ...
That’s completely irrational but you do you. Maintaining documentation is one of the best and safest uses for LLMs in coding - devs generally write bad documentation because they don’t want to do it.
That’s completely irrational but you do you. Maintaining documentation is one of the best and safest uses for LLMs in coding - devs generally write bad documentation because they don’t want to do it.
You say irrational, I say it’s rational not to trust the predictive text on steroids that often just makes shit up.
I say irrational because clearly there is a bias here and not an experience being referenced.
So you’re saying they never hallucinate? Ever?
I have evidence to the contrary;
https://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-copilot-election-questions-misinformation-2024-2
https://www.cmswire.com/customer-experience/ai-in-customer-service-billion-dollar-mistake-when-deployed-wrong/
https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2025/10/28/lawyers-ai-hallucinations-chatgpt/
https://www.reuters.com/technology/google-ai-chatbot-bard-offers-inaccurate-information-company-ad-2023-02-08/
https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/lawyer-who-cited-cases-concocted-by-ai-asks-judge-spare-sanctions-2023-06-08/
https://www.envive.ai/post/case-study-of-air-canadas-chatbot
Literally just use doxygen. You don’t ever need LLMs for docu.
There is zero chance for getting this approved to use in our Enterprise.
We have an existing tool that can do this without assessing another tool.
There is zero chance for a FOSS, offline tool that uses a decades-established formatting and annotation system, but there is 100 dicksuck on AI?
Wow… get your resume ready to migrate.