• DeadMartyr@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Tbf we should always aim for slight inflation. You want to incentivize people to use their money on things so it circulates, and it being slightly depreciating is the best way to do that.

      If it was the best option long term to just stuff money into a mattress and sit on it for a decade then that has it’s own problems

      • DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The best inflation is zero. The second best is slight inflation. The third best is slight deflation. Because they can’t control it that well they aim for slight inflation so it doesn’t go negative.

    • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Are people still out there buying new ink cartridges every time they need to print something? I was sick of that s*** in 2019 and returned my printer to Costco and I’m never buying another printer again.

        • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You just bought it? Well I’ve got news for you. It’s going to start nagging you about ink cartridges in a couple months. Yes even laser printers do this. I thought just like you when I bought a laser printer that I had escaped the ink cartridge nightmare. Nope.

          • RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            “Your laser printer, which doesn’t use ink, will nag you about buying ink” is a wild sentence.

            You must use Windows and bought an HP laser jet, cause I don’t have that problem. Linux + that Brother laser printer everyone has = tech that isn’t garbage.

    • ∃∀λ@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What should just be a little plastic box containing ink has a tiny computer inside to prove to the printer it’s not counterfeit. All so that the manufacture can have their give-the-razor-for-free-sell-the-blades business model, enforced by the anti-circumvention part of copyright law.

    • Lantsu@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just a polite reminder that if you only need to print a few papers, it’s probably cheaper/easier/free to use the printer at local library! Mine does it for like 15 cents a paper, or for free if you have your own paper! Much less hassle than buying a good printer, sorting the ink situation and then fighting with that machine…

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Big-box stores are a scam, period. Their whole business model is driving smaller local shops out of business and becoming the only game in town, and then completely screwing that town over when they leave.

      NJB has a whole video on this.

        • TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Does that mean you don’t buy insurance or are you paying someone to intentionally scam you?

          It is strange that you don’t have an option to choose a insurance company who are not scammers. I mean, that no one thought of starting an insurance company which promotes self on actually helping their customers.

          There are companies outside US who are not scamming people and still are profitable.

          • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Outside of the US here: nearly every insurance company in Belgium (that are coincidently also the banks) are 100% scamming people and literally make their entire business model off of ripping people off as much as possible.

            Using any and every excuse to deny people the insurance they paid for when they have legitimate claims is literally how they are “profitable.”

            • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              And even on the off chance they actually pay for whatever you need, you need to go through an ungodly amount of bureaucracy and most certainly pay a deductible as if you are not already paying enough for the insurance!

            • TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              We have quite a lot of public stats on the insurance companies in Denmark. You can see how many formal complaints a company have received, I.e. customers who have made a complaint a decision made by the insurance company, how many of these complaints have been in favor of the insurance company or the customer, which types of insurances each company gets most complaints about, etc. So there is a lot of data that allows you to make a informed decision about which insurance company you want to choose.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Insurance is nothing but a legal protection racket. The only difference is when you lapse on your protection money, the insurers don’t go and blow your kneecaps out, although United Health has effectively killed people who lapsed on payments before or denied them potentially life-saving drugs.

    • GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Religion is tricky. Most people search for meaning in life, and religions are an answer to that need.

      But linking religion to nations is the root of evil. Not being Catholic in Italy will cause you a lot of headaches, for example, yet you should be able to choose any religion you like and follow it freely.

      So I would say the real issue is the interplay between religion and power, and discrimination on religious grounds.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Religions claim to answer that need. But they’re bullshit. It’s all just made-up, and the made-up bullshit somehow means minorities don’t get civil rights.

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Impressed ot took this long. Every other comment is just describing capitalism working as designed, fucking over the poor to ensure a working class. Maybe do something about the torment nexus if you dont want to live under it?

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Everything about cars from manufacturing, sales, insurance, repair, registration and taxes. We could just have Public transportation.

    • GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The car is a tool to move yourself and your family/friends from place A to place B. But James Bond, Batman, rap videos made a status symbol of it. They created a modern mythology around it.

      The transformation of the automobile from a means of transport into a luminous totem of status is a near-perfect case study of what Pierre Bourdieu theorised as the conversion and misrecognition of capital.

      Bourdieu argued that capital presents itself in three fundamental guises: economic capital (money, assets), cultural capital (knowledge, taste, credentials), and social capital (networks, group membership). These are not static silos; they are constantly converted into one another to legitimise and reproduce social hierarchies. The car, in its purest state, is merely objectified economic capital, a purchased good with a clear use-value: to move from A to B. But the moment it enters the cultural field, it is inscribed with meaning, and it becomes a vehicle for symbolic capital, which Bourdieu defined as the form the other capitals take when they are perceived and recognised as legitimate.

      https://archive.org/stream/bourdieu-the-forms-of-capital-1/Bourdieu The Forms of Capital-1_djvu.txt

  • GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The real estate market. The value of labour and materials necessary to build a house is about 30 to 40 thousand euros. Everything else is speculation.

    • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Location matters though. It wouldn’t make sense for a house to cost as much as it does to make. Though obviously prices have become completely detached from reality.

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not only speculation, it’s also because some locations are a lot more wanted by many people to live there: right next to a big park, walkable neighbourhood, city amenities nearby but few city problems, no highway audible when sleeping with open window et cetera et cetera. More people want to live in prime locations than prime location housing is available.

      The big scam are the insane prices for run down shoebox-apartments in shitty locations.

    • safesyrup@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Where the fuck do you live? In switzerland your average new house costs around 300-400k

      • GiorgioPerlasca@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Value is how much socially necessary labor it actually took to build and maintain that house: materials, construction work, infrastructure, etc. It’s the real human effort crystallized in the building.

        Price is what they slap on it in the market, which can be wildly disconnected from its actual value. In housing, price gets inflated by speculation, land monopolies, credit bubbles, location hype, and landlord parasites treating homes as investment vehicles to extract rent.

        So you might have a crumbling flat that cost relatively little labor to build 40 years ago, but because it’s in a “desirable area” with a housing shortage artificially maintained by capital, its price skyrockets. That is a socially enforced ransom, not the value.

        https://open.oregonstate.education/sociologicaltheory/chapter/value-price-and-profit/