I’m also on Mastodon as https://hachyderm.io/@BoydStephenSmithJr .

  • 0 Posts
  • 74 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 2nd, 2023

help-circle












  • Steam has some good options. And, if you can play it on the Steamdeck, it will probably work on a Linux desktop.

    But, if you have specific gaming needs, please check those first. Some games just don’t work, and I wouldn’t want your to trade OSes (which all have their own frustrations) and then find yourself unable to game.

    Preferably find someone local that already uses Linux and is willing to help you out some. LUGs (Linux User Groups) used to be a thing; maybe there’s one near you. A lot of Linux users like gaming these days, though plenty of them still dual-boot.



  • bss03@infosec.pubtocats@lemmy.worldHappy Stomp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    “there can be only one” is a common saying from the Highlander series of movies and TV shows, which refers to an in-universe event where “immortals” (they can be killed by decapitation) feel compelled to “the gathering” and slay each other until the last one receives “the gift”.

    The series is named “Highlander” because the protagonist in the first movie, Connor MacLeod, is an immortal from the highlands of Scotland and often called “the highlander” by immortals, since he may be living under a different name (because even in fiction paperwork is a bitch).

    Outside of the series, “highlander” variants of various games exist which impose a limit of a single instance of a card/token/spell/action where the standard rules have a higher limit or no limit.



  • As part of getting an FFL, you effectively waive that right; the ATFE can drop by the address on the license, unscheduled, for inspection, and if you don’t let them in, your FFL we be immediately rescinded, and nearly any judge will approve a search warrant for that location over the phone in minutes.

    We could do the same for individual owners, just like dealers, and there would be supporting precedent. (But, it would certainly be subject to judicial (including SCOTUS) review.)


  • If informed, consenting patients could receive the medications they want without gatekeepers, I might be convinced this is a good thing. I certainly don’t think surgeons should be forced to perform acts they feel are immoral.

    But, we’ve set up a system of gatekeepers (yes, for safety) and their collective morality should not prevent me from medicating myself. Until we figure out a (public and patient) safety system for medication that doesn’t have gatekeepers AND that system is implemented, doctors should not be able to refuse someone medication without a medical justification.

    I also feel that most doctors operate very close to a “public accommodation”, so should be affected by the same non-discrimination laws that affect restaurants (even fancy ones where you have to book months in advance). That might not be every doctor, but it should cover enough. In that case treatments, including surgeries, can be avoided on moral grounds, but not denied based on the patient’s protected class(es).