• Nola@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    This is a society that is built around a system of forced for-profit market dependency that puts ownership enclosures over the land, commons, and productive forces into the hands of a small percentage of private capital owners then relies upon the forced dispossession of people from direct access to the means of subsistence (land, tools, resources) in order to create a class of individuals with no alternative but to sell their labor for a wage on the market so they can purchase the means of survival.

    And that in order to enforce that requires a powerful state capable of using violence when necessary to uphold that.

    So yeah, remove the enforcers and that system is likely to break down and a lot of people are going to try and loot and take what they need that they currently don’t have for survival in the short term.

    It would also likely trigger our innate communal cooperative nature that has been key to our survival and evolution as a species.

    I’m not personally an anarchist but I think you might be guilty of many of the things you accuse others of here.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      From my first comment I have simply stated that anarchism is not the answer.

      You don’t appear to necessarily be arguing against that. You do state that you think we can all come together and sing kumbaya if things fall apart. I’ll agree I think that could happen on an extremely small scale in very small communities, but not on a city/state/national level.