• PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I remember when Quake Live introduced it, but it never really gained any traction.

      A popular server-side mod for Counter-Strike (the 1.6 era) introduced in-map texture substitution for advertising as well… but I think it was pissed on by the community so much that it never saw widespread use.

      Sounds like the time is right to try again.

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        NFS Underground 2 had in-game advertising for Cingular and Burger King.

        NFS Carbon was absolutely plastered with T-mobile advertising.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Finally!

    If there’s one thing EA’s gaming lacked, it was an opportunity to accidentally click on something that tried to charge my credit card.

  • chamaeleon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    “After removing Holiday’s Ad Restrictions We estimate we can sell up to 80% of a user’s vision without inducing seizures” - Nolan Sorrento

  • Freakazoid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    And they keep asking why many people resort to piracy. Nothing is owned these days; I feel like they also want me to pay for breathing next year.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I dunno how many games EA makes set in the past or secondary worlds, but gauranteed it will drop. We may still get scifi games chock full of today’s brands.

    • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Greatest Offering Around Then?

      Because “greatest of all time” implies it’s also great now… which is a time.

      • Bademantel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        It does not. “Greatest of all time back in the day” does not imply it’s still the greatest. By your logic the future is also a time. As we don’t know it yet, nothing can ever be the greatest of all time, making the term meaningless.

          • Bademantel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            So the term is meaningless for you? That’s fine.

            Again, if something was the greatest of all time, it does not mean it still has to be. Otherwise the term is meaningless as even greater things might come in the future.

              • Bademantel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                If you only take it in the most literal sense, sure. A pointless exercise, don’t you think? Sometimes words have a funny way of meaning more than one thing. For most this concept works and GOAT can be meaningful. No, I’m not talking about the animal. Just to be clear.

              • nogooduser@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                It’s only meaningless if you’re pedantic.

                It obviously means the greatest of all time so far because at the time you make the statement you cannot judge what hasn’t happened yet.

                It gets more complicated when you’re saying it about a company or game in the past but I still think that it has meaning. It could mean that at the time, they were the greatest of all time (up until that point in time) but it could also mean that at this point in time that past version of EA was the greatest of all time (up until now, which is beyond the time that that version of EA existed).

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        We can’t know what’s going to be the greatest of all time in the future, only what’s the greatest of all time so far.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            A game developer with a consistently high hit rate in their output? Kojima, maybe? FromSoft? We’ve seen a lot of empires fall in recent years.

              • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                Really? They’ve been mostly misses from what I can tell. They don’t review very well or sell many copies for most of their games. Recent reporting indicates that Tencent no longer wants to finance them, and their future is shaky.

          • Bademantel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Very hot take but maybe Nintendo? I know, I know. They suck in some regards. But some of their games are still innovative.

            • Echo5@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              Fun take but considering how they treat their fans I wouldn’t give them that award.

  • dis_da_mor@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    reminder that saudi arabia’s public fund has bought ea. they’re trying to squeeze out all the revenue they can. tumble down the enshittification pyramid

    • Airfried@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      That’s true, although very simplified. The slightly less simplified version is that Jared Kushner’s private equidy firm and the Saudis took a huge loan to buy EA then loaded the company with that debt. EA will be forced to sell a huge chunk of their portfolio and layoff thousands of people. If they survive this somehow they will be a shadow of what once was but more likely they’ll simply vanish soon. This shit should be completely illegal but I would lie if I said I’ll miss EA. A few people at the top getting filthy rich by destroying the company seems like a very fitting end for them.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        They won’t be missed, destroyer of game franchises, studios and pioneer in anti-consumer stuff and transforming games into gambling, children welcome.

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        It should be illegal to buy a company on loan and transfer that debt to the company. You should be required to get your money back via dividends or by building the company up and reselling it.

  • mysterious_cake@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Looks like another punishment for buying their games legally. Cracked versions don’t connect to their servers so they wont load ads.

  • Aneorthisio@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I can’t wait to shoot my way around war torn half destroyed cities with pristine advertising signs in the next Battlefield.

  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    EA you’re already known as the worst, you don’t need to prove the point any more…

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      UBISOFT is trying vie for that number 1 spot, they went so far as help produce a show on appletv+ to spread good propaganda bout itself.

      • Stupendous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        EA to my knowledge just has shitty business practices. Ubisoft at a minimum had a culture of sexual harrassers, possibly assaulters. Blizzard certainly had rapists. Ubisoft also with the pioneering always online DRM for single player games getting back to the games portion of their evils