What’s up with this straight up pro-china and pro-russia stuff on Lemmy lately?

It’s not even praising the people of China and Russia, but rather their gov directly.

Obviously the states have problems, and the EU to a lesser degree, but they at least have some human rights.

Is this some kind of organized disinformation campaign?

  • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    ~I’m not who you were replying to before.~

    I agree that the chinese mixed market model is better, and that the US sucks ass, but I have one question about your claims.

    PRC, the working class is the one in charge!

    can you explain to me how that can be true while the government is unelected and visibly does authoritarian stuff such as censorship, violent repression of various undesireables and supression of independent worker’s unions?

      • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The source for those is either you, quora, or the ccp.

        Not very reliable sources, and the results of the polls which I do know are legitimate may be explained by the lack of free press.

        Some of the stuff is true, like the better healthcare system, or high speed rail, but that’s more the US being absymally bad than china being great

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      First of all, the state is an extension of the class in power, it isn’t a class in and of itself. The class in power is the one in control of the large firms and key industries, in the PRC these are publicly owned. This can help make sense of the Chinese model of socialism.

      With that in mind, the government is elected. It doesn’t have the same kind of competing party model of liberal democracy, but socialist democracy is focused on cohesion and cooperation. The government does censor speech, but that isn’t incompatible with working class power, the speech that is censored is largely capitalists trying to undermine the system (like Jack Ma). Further, independent worker unions in the context of socialism is dangerous, the government is already one run by the working class, so having a divided working class is more of a way for capitalists to drive a wedge between them and undermine the system.

      I think if you read up more on SWCC things will make more sense.

      • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Well, if the class in power is the one who controls the large firms, key industries and media, then the class in power are the high-ranking CCP officials, no? And ccp officials choose who the new ccp officials will be. I don’t see how the working class is involved here. I don’t really understand how the government is elected.

        I don’t really want to go read a bunch of theory, because I think you should be able to leverage your clearly extensive knowledge of the subject to convince me.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          First of all, the state is an extension of the class in power, it isn’t a class in and of itself.

          The CPC is not a class, it’s the most politically advanced of the proletariat, largely. CPC officials are elected as well. It isn’t fashioned like a liberal democracy, but a socialist one.

          I get not wanting to read theory, and I understand needing to meet people where they are at. What’s your understanding of the Chinese system of democracy? What distinguishes socialist democracy from liberal democracy? What is a class, in your eyes? If I don’t know where you personally stand in your understanding, then I don’t really know where to start beyond what I’ve already shared.