this is satire. it was done as a bit eith alberta tech comedy youtibe channel. did you read the vompany testimonials? one of tbe companies is called “Totally Real Company”.

thanks. one of these days i will stop doing rush drive by comments on my phone.

for Zuck specifically, it feels like ego.

thats a lot of water you used. far more than data centers themselves you used a fifth of the water golf courses use, a 10th of what almond farming uses and a 20th of what water the lawn takes but you take more.

what does meta have to do with tbe university system?

They arr complaining about a future where there wont be jobs. but to be clear all these big layoffs have been cyclicaland they used ai to get investors excited.

but just like all advances, any job that goes away is replaced by something new.

the biggest problem we have is the head of open ai is the biggest ai doomer.

he tells everyone that ai will destroy us all but its coming so better embrace it.

i am not a doomer and i am not an ai worshipper. i tjink there will be disruption but it wont be the end.

unlike the industrial revolution, there hasnt been bombings yet.

i thought this posy was “what may i be missing by not using plex” - nope! - its “list your reasonfor not using jellyfin so i can argue with you”

What am I doing wrong?

I think it’s possible you have few misconceptions of things. There are only negatives.

This is a different topic though. Sure its related but the students aren’t booing because of chip shortage. The hype will die down. Ai wont go anywhere but the crazy ramp up and "everyone need sot be in AI’ will die down.

universal has been doing it for years. i am not sure how it will play out.

no one is making you like games but why even participate in the community?

The anti-ai wave is mostly a north american issue. people in china just see a new tool they have to learn. like most issues with americans, it has become binary. either ai will bring utopia or it will destroy us all.

everything goes back to republicans destroying education and americans defining their lives by social media

thats funny… i dont use gemini but i know llms can mirror the user’s personality over time. is this how you talk or was this completely random? claude isnt this sassy for me.

i am so tired my glasses are starting to fail me and i read:

Major Zohran Mamdani is going to live (short i) on twitch in new streaming series.

so i pictured a netflix show where he lives on twitch 24/7 in a big brother type living room.

no one but the most hopeless people think selling ai generated books is a good idea.

this is what it really is. this seems very normal but its happening on a service owned by a shitty person so people make a big deal. this isnt enshiyification, as another commenter said because it doesnt affect a normal user.

to make.money ues, but mu.company of two people doesnt make rich people richer. we work to make money, i rather own my company than work for someone else

ok , rant time, from a guy who doesnt have a problem with llms — i hate vibe coding.

when it was first mentioned, i pictured people slapping somethjng together at hone for some weird niche use they have, that no one cares about. but no, rheu want to throw it upon the world and take credit for creating something.

they slam open source projects with useless commits so they can say “look at me, look at me”

In contrast, i have been professionally developing software for over 27 years and i have created stuff at home that i tell no one about. i have contributed to open source and told no one. (unless a groip of enthusiasts asked me to fix something).

i just dont understand the mindset of these people who use llms to say “please help me contribute to the linux kernel so i can tell people i did something”

this is a decent read. theres honest criticism and not a “m$ sux lol” rant. a someone who can agnostically enjpy tech history, i would like to see how this plays out.

the person who wrote the article is… not a great thinker but you get some good answers from Cerf, so worth a read.

The first mistake the author makes is thst Tim Berners-Lee is not one of the fathers of the internet but of the world wide web. it runs on the application layet of the internet and came decades later.

The second mistake is corrected by Cerf. the difference between a discovery and an invention.