So to not have the win we think it is, the California and Colorado bills would have to mandate age verification for open source operating systems.

Can you explain the wording in the law that contradicts OP’s claims?

It absolutely is the win we think it is. These are separate from mandating open source to include age verification.

They never mentioned no immutability. They wanted stable.

I’ve had zero issues, never had to ostree a single thing, its absolutely fine for daily use

Then just use Bazzite

Calling debian and ubuntu outdated is batshit insane

Authoritarianism. Now its your turn to do something Canadians, don’t let it spread.

A reverse proxy is what you are looking for. I recommend Caddy.

You’ll also need a domain, but they can be had for very cheap.

Its a joke

Let him have it. This is how you manipulate people like him.

Sure, but then you have the cold war fears from the soviet union, which obviously were not there for 90% of the 90’s

The 90’s were a far better period for America

What is your matrix front end called?

No, I read for fun and that doesn’t look like a book I’d have fun reading

My books are on my phone…

Best use of AI of all time

Gross is an imaginary concept selected for reducing disease

Moneygrams

I could have written this. Every single thing you are struggling I’ve struggled with as well. All of it can and will get better, I promise. Patience with yourself and the world is key.

I’d be inclined to agree

What will they do when 40% of the population can no longer afford to feed themselves and are rioting on a scale never seen in American history?