Stop sealioning

Do you call sealioning every question you feel lazy to answer to?

Calling it “advertising” comes from a perspective that women are necessarily focused only on men, and trying to trick men.

Isn’t that true sometimes?

It ain’t the size that matters

… Unless said size is too small

Calling yoga pants a false advertisement is misogyny?

Now would it be a CP or a CSAM in the case of the video of children consentingly doing it between themselves?

Only abstract is available by that link.
And the abstract doesn’t support your exact claims.

Also:

group of adolescent sibling incest offenders (n=21) compared to a group of adolescent non-sibling offenders (n=24).

Do you call this well studied?

💀

I started growing our own produce

And meats?

Plague

skin tone

Oh come on!

No, the burger day you didn’t.

It would be strange to me to see a Caucasian person in a film adaptation of a myth of ancient China or of an African tribe as well.

Maybe that’s inbreeding grammar, what do we know

why, an STD

And that’s why you’re alive and she’s your ex, right?

??

If you prefer dating humans without genetic defects, congratulations; you’re a eugenicist.

Colloquially eugenics refers not to personal preferences, but to collective imperatives, as far as I know.

Nothing about people who never existed can be miscast by skin color

You’re ready to throw ethnological context out of the window?
It seems pretty important to the myth representation.

It’s a myth.

It’s a myth of ancient Greece.

In my opinion the appearance of an actor may be irrelevant for the theatrical piece, but for cinema miscast will damage the overall image.

Why is it fine for parents with documented genetic conditions to do the same?

While I tend to agree, that’s a highly controversial view (see eugenics).