I have been noting this more recently and it seems to be a trend, at least with people I converse with on the regular. The really religious types aren’t animal people or downright dont like them. The more chill or agnostic types seem to be more apt to love animals.

I could go on my theory of this but I’m interested to see if anyone thinks this is a trend.

  • disregardable@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s not that they don’t like animals. It’s that they don’t view animals as equal to humans. They believe that god made them superior to animals, so what happens to animals doesn’t really matter.

    • confuser@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m 90% sure that modern Christianity is not actually correct Christianity because if you read about jesus, everything about him is coded in eastern spiritualism, as if he learned it from someone else and explained it to the other people that wrote about Jesus and didn’t understand the symbolism and allowed it to evolve into ego inducing assholery.

    • JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I basically came here to say this. Especially these days basically all good pet owners think of them as their children or at least living beings with rights. And abrahamic religions (I know less about others) view humans as being god’s special creatures who have dominion over all others. Same reason there’s often more child abuse in religious homes.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I guess I could have phrased this exact question with “the environment” and probably got the same answers. (Bad) religious people think it’s all “theirs” so they can do whatever they want and pollute all they want as “god” will take care of the earth no matter what.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        You might want to note that while this probably applies to major religions, it’s not all religions

        Also this is probably a good representation from the bible

        Genesis 1:28 (KJV): “And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.”

    • ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s only part of it. You’ve described Dominionists, the other end are are the Stewards, Stewards believe its our duty to tend the Earth and its creatures as it is God’s dominion, not ours.

      • disregardable@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        What I said also applies to stewardship, though. They both still abuse animals and then say “But Jesus ate fish.”

    • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I don’t think an animal’s life is of equal value to a human’s. I don’t think that’s a strictly religious view point either. Should they have shot harambe to save that kid, or was that action equivalent to murder?

      • Onyxonblack@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Typical creature that values it’s own species over all others. I really despise this mentality. Anyway have a great day.

        • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Should they have shot harambe or let it rip the kid in half? Is it your position that all organisms are of equal value?

            • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              What are the other options ? This is a binary discussion. A human life is of more impact and relevance than an animal’s. Therefore it’s value is higher. I have a ton of animals, farm and pet, I LOVE my animals. I’d put my girl’s life above all of them in a second.

              • Hawke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                For your first question: there is no certainty that Harambe would have “ripped the kid in half”.

                For your second, you could value some species more than your own and others less, there’s no reason all species must be equally valuable (let alone individuals) Although the idea of thinking about things that way at all is a little gross to me.

                • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Is it genuinely your belief that the kid would have been fine? Or even any 100% safe solution outside of what happened? What was done ensured the safety of the human child, as it should have. You’re misusing false dichotomy. The user I was responding to stated

                  “Typical creature that values it’s own species over all others.”

                  The all or nothing aspect I gave is a direct response to the one they gave. The implication being the user does not value human life over all other life. I do, which is why this started and is ending as a binary conversation. Secondary to that, whats better than what in a tier list is completely irrelevant to the conversation.

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re using too much logic for an emotional thread, lol.

        The people who are “animals over humans!!!” or equate them don’t love nor care for anybody besides themselves in earnest. They’ll stay in their little corner with their pets, shaking in fear just thinking about deep human connections until the day they die. 🤷‍♂️