Other open source software gets similar treatment, with Colorado going as far as explicitly excluding code repositories and container platforms.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        We’re literally on one “we” made on our own right now. So yeah, exactly, we’ll make our own. With blackjack… and hookers. In fact forget the platforms.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The fun part of open source is that someone smarter than me will inevitably just update the existing spoofing tools to include whatever checks those platforms are using.

  • chrash0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 hours ago

    oh wow gee thank you for not… [checks notes]… forcing open source developers to write state mandated spyware without compensation

    • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      “Thank you for not forcing me to participate in your getting-kicked-in-the-balls program… But perhaps just don’t?”

  • Miller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I would not accuse the legislators of any decency of thought only that open source would be far harder to police due to its more nebulous and intermingled path to the client with far less money at the end of it.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There may have also been some big money lobbyists from companies like Google, Amazon, etc, that pointed out how much money it would have cost their poor shareholders to implement.

      • Miller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        The entire dynamic is off somehow, so age verification is for the safety of children but won’t be implemented on some platforms for reasons that are by extension more pressing than child safety, as if such reasons might exist. It is almost like age verification is actually nothing to do with child safety.