Why not? Apparently they go unpunished. Trump will be soil before trials for any of these atrocities begin.

No no, it’s an app where you literally talk to Jesus H. Christ over e2e chat.

Y’know they sell honey in squeezable bottles like ketchup and other condiments, right? This stupid wooden barrel on a stick solution seems like a recipe for a sticky mess. Also, do you just leave it in the jar, making it impossible to put the lid back on? Take it out, covered in honey, and wash it for later?

My disdain for bad tools is irrational, I know.

Edit: Squeeze honey is not honey. BUT! I’d still pour it out of its jar and into a squeezable container because once you’ve squeezed, you’ll wonder how you’ve gotten on this long without it.

Yes, there are technically ways to lower prices. The impossibility is due to the complete lack of incentive for corporations to do so. So, it won’t be happening.

We should GoFundHim far enough to take over that store and fire the manager.

This poster https://calckey.world/notes/afzolhb0xk is more articulate than my post.

The difference between this “spec-driven” approach is that the entire process is repeatable by AI once you’ve gotten the spec sorted. So you no longer work on the code, you just work on the spec, which can be a collection of files, files in folders, whatever — but the goal is some kind of determinism, I think.

I use it on a much smaller scale and haven’t really cared much for the “spec as truth” approach myself, at this level. I also work almost exclusively on NextJS apps with the usual Tailwind + etc stack. I would certainly not trust a developer without experience with that stack to generate “correct” code from an AI, but it’s sort of remarkable how I can slowly document the patterns of my own codebase and just auto-include it as context on every prompt (or however Cursor does it) so that everything the LLMs suggest gets LLM-reviewed against my human-written “specs”. And doubly neat is that the resulting documentation of patterns turns out to be really helpful to developers who join or inherit the codebase.

I think the author / developer in the article might not have been experienced enough to direct the LLMs to build good stuff, but these tools like React, NextJS, Tailwind, and so on are all about patterns that make us all build better stuff. The LLMs are like “8 year olds” (someone else in this thread) except now they’re more like somewhat insightful 14 year olds, and where they’ll be in another 5 years… Who knows.

Anyway, just saying. They’re here to stay, and they’re going to get much better.

Untrained dev here, but the trend I’m seeing is spec-driven development where AI generates the specs with a human, then implements the specs. Humans can modify the specs, and AI can modify the implementation.

This approach seems like it can get us to 99%, maybe.

Sounds over-engineered, unless your “poop counter” is nine brown smears on the toilet lid.

I’d love to see a Japanese fan style phone 🪭 Maybe it folds up into a reusable straw?

The fuck do you get for paid email? It’s literally just SMTP/POP — where’s the “value add”? I use my own email client so the bullshit ads from Google aren’t an issue, but am I missing out on some email 2.0 magic??

Yo, what’s wrong with your goats?

Bro… Your nipples… Bro…

Yeah, where’s this headline?

That’s one interpretation of the headline.

Unfortunately, it might be both.

When has Trump lost anything at the Supreme Court? Aren’t they in his pocket?

Another classic, creepily thirsty Mickey7 post…

You might be Benjamin Button-ing!

I’d argue it’s morally reprehensible NOT to exterminate these parasites.

“Customs and Border Patrol”.

You mean ICE? Someone took shots at ICE while they were in the middle of a randomized deportation?