Problem is the e2e encryption. The bridge basically decrypts your emails and makes them locally accessible.

It is technically impossible at the moment to keep your emails end-to-end encrypted and not have to use a bridge for your client of choice. It will only be possible if your client of choice partners with Proton to integrate them, or if a standard for e2e encrypted emails pops up and both Proton and your client adopt it.

Because forking a buggy suite isn’t always the best choice? If they have the ressources, and they do, making their own is best for everyone. More choices.

Obviousness? If you mass layoff your tech staff, you take the risk of more technical failures.

A smaller staff cannot do the same work as a larger one, and I guarantee you they’re being asked to progress at the same speed. So, the tradeoff is on the quality of the product and the testing, not on the speed of development.

Because the crypto market overreacts, always

It’s an excuse. A bullshit one. The real reason for this “problem” being addressed is that the meat industry is threatened, and lobbies hard to fight the plant based industry.

But they will lose, eventually.

This is a tactic used by far right parties for much longer than China and Russia have had the chance to interfere with US and Europe politics.

Republicans picked these wedge issues all by themselves, following the manual of fascism to the T.

It is a specific virus of the herpes family, with a very fitting name

I don’t bite to the conspiracy theory that he setup his own assassination attempt either. The bullet was real and very close. He wouldn’t gamble with his life.

I don’t buy it. It is extremely risky, and, frankly, he doesn’t need that to execute his dictatorship plans.

Plus the likes of that piece of shit are part of his propaganda machine.

Not every system fits every country.

France had republics before the current 5th that had the president as more of a ceremonial role. But it did not work for us, and both the third and fourth republics ended up with political instability and governments falling one after the other.

The 5th republic purposefully gave more power to the president, to remediate the political instability that France had seen with the previous systems. It works.

No democratic system is perfect. The one Greece has, per your comment, sounds great in theory. But the day where the 3 top parties can’t come to an agreement, and the elections don’t change the outcome, you’ll have an extended period of instability where the government is unable to do anything. And that is absolutely awful for a country.

It is great that Greece isn’t encountering these issues. But France has, and the current system is a fix to that. Let’s not repeat bad History by reverting to a system we know does not work for us.

No, it’s by design. Giving the government to the largest group doesn’t always make sense.

If your largest group is 40%, but the other groups forming the remaining 60% all disagree with the largest group, how is it more democratic to give the 40% group the government? Then you have a givernment that only 40% of the parliament supports.

If you pick a government that satisfies the 60% remaining, you then have a government 60% of the parliament supports. How is that less democratic?

It’s more complicated than that. Don’t get me wrong, I voted for the left block and was pissed they didn’t get to form a government. But it is more complicated than that.

The president has to pick a government that will be able to pass laws with the vote of the parliament. While the left block had the plurality, the rest of the parliament would likely not have voted their policies. Picking a government that would satisfy the rest of the parliament was the best move for stability and to have a government able to do something.

That’s not anti democratic. And that’s actually the system that is used in most representative democracies, in different forms, which always summarises to: Head of state picks a government that has the most chances to be accepted by the parliament.

If history had been allowed to witness the two (not to mention Himmler) truly brought to justice on a world stage, could it have potentially decreased the chances others would feel emboldened enough to follow in their footsteps?

I highly doubt it. Power thirsty assholes won’t be stopped so easily.

deleted by creator

You might find something in Norway.

Obviously not. The cause of death was overheating.

Yeah, considering it is not impossible to geoblock per instance, they could.

Not a single part of your answer is about how the brain works.

Concepts are not things in your brain.

Consciousness is a concept. It doesn’t exist in your brain.

Thinking is how a human uses their brain.

I’m asking about how the brain itself functions to intepret natural language.

That doesn’t answer the question you quoted.