Not a trap, it’s just that “slop” is an english word that has a relevant meaning in this context. It’s not like it’s just made up slang for describing AI stuff.

Are you a native english speaker? Just curious.

In this thread.

Going to need a source for a bombshell like that.

Austrian

Usenet is federated (which is a type of decentralization), and I think OP means peer-to-peer (fully distributed).

Where are the sample queries and corresponding results to demonstrate that it works well? Oh there aren’t any?

I thought this was going to be a new article or news, but it’s from April 9, 2024.

I think this situation has been picked over and rehashed now to the point where anyone who was going to change their behaviour will have already done so. If there is no update on the situation then all I see is you dragging up drama from a year ago.

Yes it is completely fine and legal.

You’ll only have a problem if the application has features that are patented and the patents are enforceable. Or if you are impersonating a trademark.

Can you link the bug report please?

The irony is that if we didn’t have the tracking scripts blocked then they might actually receive the metrics about how we close their website as soon as the newsletter popup occurs, leading them to fix or remove it. Probably not though.

Although there were already discussions about it as early as 2005 (and earlier), Loic and company had been hosting a Web3 conference in France (“Le Web3”) for a few years back then. (The real Web3, not the crypto-Web3. < this is why many, if not most, Fediverse devs don’t like crypto, the crypto enthusiasts stole “Web3”)

I think you’ve retconned a little bit here. LeWeb3 was named as a sequel to the previous conference which was called LeBlogs2. Remember, at that time Web 2.0 hadn’t really taken off yet - browsers had only just implemented the XMLHTTPRequest API - so it wouldn’t have made sense to already be talking about Web 3.0.

Here is an original document containing some history of LeWeb3: https://web.archive.org/web/20070704054929/http://www.loiclemeur.com/LeWeb3executivesummaryv1.pdf

It was pretty obvious the approach behind for instance Deep Blue wasn’t the way forward.

That’s a weird example to pick. What exactly about Deep Blue do you think wasn’t the way forward?

What did he lie about? What was the larger case about?

Good luck alt-tabbing to the one you want.

This is what workspaces are for.

That’s it, I’m calling the police.

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

a ISO

Trying to monetize the piracy of your users. That’s a bold business strategy.

Look, I know a lot of people could be using the sharing feature to share material that is in the public domain or that they own the copyright to, but let’s be honest: most of that sharing would be considered an “unlicensed public performance” by the MAFIAA.