Are you suggesting aiding and abetting a genocide is a mole problem? I beg to differ.
It is an example of hypocrisy when the Biden administration praises themselves as leader of the free world and promotes a rules based order only to be accomplices of genocide.
Of course, this does not excuse what the Trump administration is doing.
The Biden administration has been happy aiding and abetting a genocide which caused hundreds of thousands of casualties, most of them innocent women and kids.
Both sides are hypocrites. Remember Nancy Pelosi getting a haircut during Covid when regular people couldn’t? Or Gavin Newsom attending a birthday party during his own lockdown?
Yes they did, in May 2024, Netanyahu immediately rejected it and the Biden administration refused to apply any meaningful pressure, which is why there was no deal until Steven Witkoff got involved.
It’s easy enough to replace an iPhone battery
Press the power button and one of the volume buttons for 3 seconds.
Yes it’s very unfortunate, but we got almost a two month ceasefire which we wouldn’t have gotten with the Biden administration…
No, there is not. There are many tax credits one is no longer eligible for after a certain threshold. There are various programs one is no longer eligible for after a certain threshold.
There’s not enough information provided to reach this conclusion.
Enjoy it. A great number of people in the US have been conditioned to tie up their sense of worth to their job, and can’t comprehend there’s more to life.
I’d take 12 years paternity leave if I could.
Assuming your numbers are correct, after one year the interest is $70. I doubt you’d get anyone out to conduct the inspection at that price, let alone two because you need one at move in and one at move out; and let’s not even get started about potential the additional work should there be a dispute by the tenant or the landlord.
You mean they keep a portion of the deposit to determine who receives the payout? If you meant they only keep a portion of the revenues produced by the investment, which obviously must be one of the safest ones available and thus will have low return on investment, I’m afraid that would not be economically viable for the escrow company.
If you’re going to ask the government to step in, I would suggest to make building more housing easier.
If it falls through again in a week or two, I have more faith in the Trump administration to potentially bring peace again than in the Biden administration. Biden was unwilling to use any serious leverage in order to get the Israeli government to stop the genocide.
I don’t like Trump. I merely acknowledge he has been far more successful in stopping the genocide compared to Biden. I do not agree with the Trump administration illegally detaining people.
What we are trying to avoid here is a conflict of interest where the third party would side with whoever pays them most of the time.
It’s important to prevent conflict of interests but asking the city to step in in every single rental agreement is not necessarily an effective solution. Someone else here suggested having the cost split between the tenant and the landlord, which has the merit of addressing the potential conflict of interest.
That’s if everything goes well. What if the tenant does not approve the photos?
A split between the parties might help avoid conflict of interests
Above $125.
That’s not true.