

The ol Texas loophole.
Could you elaborate? My understanding of anarchism is the goal of eliminating government. That won’t eliminate an economic system that originated organically.
And price controls have a pretty terrible track record of providing a net benefit.


And instead we get politicians worse than VEEP. Ouch.


They said with suspicious confidence…
Plus, probably still required to do military service, only you get no armor and face knights in full plate who have trained their whole lives to kill you.


Has this shown to be effective at stopping bots? It seems like you’d just be a few bad actors to ruin the system


I was assuming you’d make an account with the ID for the govt instance and use anonymous accounts for all other browsing. At least that’s what I would do.


I’m not familiar with web of trust. What does that mean?


I believe there is existing precedent from SCOTUS that official government Twitter accounts were not allowed to block citizens accounts due to it being a ‘public square’. So that was a govt official taking the action of silencing someone’s ability to respond to them on social media protected by 1A. If the PLATFORM had blocked that user it would have been perfectly valid, since the GOVT did not silence a citizen’s speech.
I believe having the govt run the instance would make the entire forum subject to 1A in a way current social media is not. Would love a constitutional scholar to chime in, but that’s my argument.


I also don’t get the impression there is a large bot presence here today. I do think if the platform was used as a normal communication network between constituient and representative it would probably become a target for foreign and domestic bots.
Onewheels are so much fun.
Yeah, it seems like a demise built around suffering and helplessness. If you crave the sweet release of death, this isn’t it.
That is the fanciest ping pong paddle satchel I’ve ever seen! It’s also the first.