Sci-fi & horror author, UXD, software dev, composer/engraver, gamer, seamstress/tailor, nerd, etc; she/her. Aroace.

  • 18 Posts
  • 160 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle








  • LillyPip@lemmy.catoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldWe can play that game too
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Of course I do. And again, that’s my point.

    People romanticise this, but it’s impossible for many reasons. You can easily try, but we have societies for a reason.

    Everyone is free to do this, but good luck in practice. It’s not just hard, and it’s not just stupid, but why the fuck would you want this? It’s insane, and we’re not geared for this.

    Life in the wilderness is not a Disney movie. It’s so ruthlessly difficult, that’s why society exists. We are stronger, safer, and happier together.


  • LillyPip@lemmy.catoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldWe can play that game too
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Yes, that would need to be the plan. One upfront payment then never paying for utilities or other things forever. That’s the only way this works. You don’t need income, because you live on rabbits and fish and your garden. If your house burns, you put it out with buckets from your stream. You build your house yourself by cutting down trees.

    If you get sick, you either die or you don’t.

    I think this is madness, but that’s how you do this.



  • LillyPip@lemmy.catoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldWe can play that game too
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Yeah, but ‘nobody wants to be there for a reason’ is my whole point.

    It will absolutely suck for you. That’s why civilisation is better, and also why we have to make some concessions to be in a society.

    There’s no utopia where everything is perfect. There never was.

    If you want societal amenities, you have to pay for them in some small way, and if you don’t, your life will be very hard. Those have always been the choices.



  • LillyPip@lemmy.catoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldWe can play that game too
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    You’d have to buy your own land, of course.

    But you could buy a tiny plot in the middle of nowhere, not hook up any utilities or have roads, and just live off your land if you wanted.

    There are small parcels in the middle of noplace that nobody wants because there are no roads, utilities, or other services.


  • LillyPip@lemmy.catoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldWe can play that game too
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    So many people don’t understand why we live in a society, and apparently have no capacity for empathy.

    They’re free to go live in the wilderness, with no roads, no fire department, no water or electricity, no services whatever, and find out how much they’re actually benefiting from our collective.

    They won’t, because though they like to complain, they’re pussies who can’t be bothered to think for 5 minutes that the fact they can read and write their snarky bullshit is because they benefitted from free education, else they’d be illiterate.

    But gods forbid they pay back the overwhelming amount they benefit from society in a small way. It’s fucking infuriating.




  • The rivers of fire was one major thing that contributed to the formation of the EPA, actually. In the preceding decades, if was totally normal for industry to just dump whatever waste into rivers and nobody cared.

    We still have far too much pollution going on, but I feel many people have forgotten just how egregious it was before government regulations were put in place to stop shit like that.

    It’s pretty bad now, but more to the point, we’re still paying for the wanton destruction wrought decades ago. And now ‘conservatives’ (air quotes because in this case, it’s the opposite) want to roll back regulations because freedom.