- 0 Posts
- 234 Comments
72·2 days agoFor news and sport it could be useful.
Tag it as bot generated. Don’t allow bot comments.
4·2 days agoTrump doesn’t have a plan.
But the people running Trump do, and they are not stupid. These tariffs must indirectly benefit them.
6·2 days agoThis is why the Chinese openly releasing deepseek was such a kick in the balls to the LLM tech bros.
3·3 days agoHe and I still dance.
I feel there is a big difference between being able to skate at 45 and learning to skate at 45.
I used to skate as a kid, but I never once managed to pop an ollie.
In this case the AI voices are reading the exact copyrighted material so the original author or rights holder must be contacted to secure the necessary rights and licensing agreements. There is no free use argument.
Now, if the voices have been trained on copy protected sources to create a likenesses (e.g. Scarlet Johansson) then there could be a lawsuit.
Not sure what you are trying to say here. AI itself is an equation.
AI voices are not trained on books.
The ethical issue there is more around cloning celebrities
Removed by mod
It’s totally feasible, just very expensive.
Either copyright doesn’t exist in its current form or AI companies don’t.