“the misinformation is popular, despite those involved disregarding it. so I shall believe it.”

?

Yeah I think the above comment is inappropriately tying the issue to a topic they specifically said wasn’t the motivation

If you call out genocide denialism you get banned. That’s enough for me to consider it wall to wall tankies

Speak however you like to someone who just tried to kill you.

But at the end of the day it’s “art” (shitty, copyright infringing, yes.), Or at minimum “media”. When has other media been “grossly negligent” or generally responsible for the acts of the consumers? Aggressive/emotional books or music certainly has joined folks at the moment of their self inflicted demise. Violent video games have certainly been “on the shelf” for some who commit horrible violence. We don’t blame those media for causing what the users do…

Edit to be clear I’m not suggesting mentally unstable folks can’t be seriously impacted by the content they consume. Or that that isn’t a serious issue.

But if a chatbot is held liable for the actions of a user, why wouldn’t a song about ending your life be held to the same standard? I would hope it’s not.

Semantics, given the scope and intention of my comment

They need to be using an encrypted platform hosted in a country out of reach of Nintendo

Sorry what’s the joke here? Big parts of India has issues with sanitation