Endmaker

deleted by creator

Well-played.

but not calculus or set theory

My computer science curriculum covered calculus - perhaps not as rigorously as the mathematical sciences, but enough for it to be “working” knowledge (personally, I’ve forgotten 90% of it since graduation).

Plus, I am sure a computer science teacher should be at least familiar with these topics, or be capable of picking them up.

That’s basically every trash isekai anime / manga / light novel.

computer scientist / CS teacher, probably the 1960’s

I’m not sure how well of a living they’ve made back then, but surely mathematicians / math teachers were a thing since ancient times.

Perhaps to mess with bots that scrape content?

Maybe some kind of bot detection is done in the background, and humans are able to pass the check easily when they click on the button. Crawlers, on the other hand, would have a harder time getting through.

I guess this is to prevent others from reposting their content easily.

Fantail. It is pretty cute.

If it has to be extinct, then Deinonychus. It is like the Velociraptor, but is actually big enough to mean business.

Tribalism. Humankind haven’t progress beyond the instincts of having in-groups and out-groups.

Until that happens, there will be discrimination. People would see things in black and white instead of understanding there are shades of gray between.

deleted by creator

What I learnt in school is that polysaccharides are complex sugar (as opposed to simple sugars like glucose).

So they are, by definition, sugar too.

Isn’t there a term for them already? “terminally online”

it’s that there aren’t even any realistic theoretical applications.

Here’s the neat thing about research: the researcher themselves may not even know the kind of outcomes their research would bring about in the future.

It is not necessarily a known unknown in which we work towards a theoretical application; it could very well be an unknown unknown.

OpenCerts

An easy way for employers to verify that your certifications are authentic.

Tangentially, a lot of scientists do research on topics that do not see application in everyday life immediately.

I can’t think of any examples off the top of my head, but I remember reading articles on how some research bear fruit - ones with huge impacts - only decades later.

To stop research into a topic because there is no practical application now is short-sighted IMO.

“People” as in actual humans? None, I think.

If I block those with frequent trash takes, I won’t get to downvote them next time. Other reasonable people would then see their future posts with higher scores.

anime_irl

xkcd: standards