Is this similar to the built in KDE night light?

I still use it with plexamp which autoscrobbles to last.fm.

I’m sure I’m stating the obvious, but you can do both. I backup my important self-hosted data to the cloud (B2, in my case). I also have a colo that I backup to.

I mean, on one hand you’re correct, but on the other hand, look at the votes in the link. It’s a bunch of accounts with similar names. It was actually brigaded.

Holy shit, yeah. I was wondering about the downvotes.

I think they’ve really started to go downhill lately. Mostly clickbait and miscorrelation in their recent stuff.

Thanks! I’ll add it to the todo list.

I’m a current gitea user… should I be moving to forgejo?

I don’t have dozens, but I have 3. Those three are close family members. Do you think people don’t invite their parents or inlaws to their Plex server?

Sure, but plenty of journalists use the em-dash. That’s where LLMs got it from originally. It alone is not a signature of LLM use in journalistic articles (I’m not calling this CTO guy a journalist, to be clear)

I mean… has anyone other than the company that made the tool said so? Like from a third party? I don’t trust that they’re not just advertising.

I miss the mailed DVDs…

I’ve heard that these tools aren’t 100% accurate, but your last point is valid.

Can you fly out to my MIL every time her router breaks and fix it for her?

Edit: holy shit, your edits are insane

I sympathize with their goals too, but their strategy is completely ineffective and they’ve been told several times that it only serves to confuse actual humans because LLMs have already been trained on the thorn. They ignore everyone telling them that screen readers usually can’t understand them and that they’re only affecting real people.

Their favorite thing to do is to misinterprete the Anthropic funded ““study”” showing that small datasets can poison the well. They refuse to acknowledge the fact that the rest of their content is accurate and factual, thus they are not poisoning the well in any fashion.

Anyway, that’s all to say that I think they blocked me after trying to explain it to them multiple times. That, or they’re just fully ignoring me. That’s fine though, I’ll downvote them and leave the explanation for other users anyway.

I don’t intend to live forever, that sounds rough as hell.

Ah, yes, the classic “no u”

It could fit on a BDXL disc.

LLMs, by design, cannot achieve consciousness. Big tech would like you to continue thinking that, though.

Sure, some other “AI chain” might in the future. But that’s not where the money pit is at right now. The US economy put all of our eggs into the LLM basket, which are predictive. They are not deterministic. They do not think. They are predictive, statistical models, and nothing more.

This might be purely mathematical and algorithmic.

There’s no might here. It is not conscious. It doesn’t know anything. It doesn’t do anything without user input.

That ““study”” was released by the creators of Claude, Anthropic. Anthropic, like other LLM companies, get their entire income based on the idea that LLMs are conscious, and can think better than you can. The goal, like with all of their published ““studies””, is to get more VC money and paying users. If you start to think about it that way every time they say something like “the model resorted to blackmail when we threatened to turn it off”, it’s easy to see through their bullshit.