• SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I believe anyone who is capable of processing our current reality and the course we are heading down, who still chooses to create a life, is knowingly performing a selfish and immoral act.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I think it’s ethical to shame them for prioritizing their own desires over the life of their child.

          I don’t think it’s ethical for laws to decide who can have children, but I also think letting anyone have children is not sustainable for our species. So ideally a solution to overpopulation is an educated population that makes their own individual responsible decisions.

          If i were given total control I would probably force aspiring parents to adopt until there are no unwanted children left. Then we can think about making more

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Such deep moral philosophy over here.

        Humans are mostly sentient biological machines at the end of the day, hard wired for an instinctual need to reproduce. Without children, everything falls apart. South Korea, Japan, China, Germany, US, etc etc all have declining birth rates. Fortunately for many Western countries, we’ve had immigrants to provide a buffer against the inverted age demographic pyramid crisis. South Korea, on the other hand, is looking at essentially a full economic collapse by 2060 because their birth rates have continually declined for so long and right now is at 0.76.

        So tell me, when millions of old people are dying from neglect and no access to healthcare, food, etc. from lack of workers in 2070, will you be sitting there with such a mighty, holier than thou attitude? Probably, because you likely just have an edgy hot take that humans are garbage and deserve to go extinct. Such deep moral philosophy, you should teach in college.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Why is the purpose of me being alive to wipe boomers’ asses after they threw the world in the trash?

          It’s not my problem, if they want a sustainable system where the old are supported they had their whole lives to make it happen.

          Alternatively they can fucking quit their positions of power so younger people can fix their mess.

        • HP_Rubshaft@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          One doesn’t have to think that all humans are trash and deserve to die in order to think that it’s not cool to bring a whole ass human into a shitty situation so that the labor pool stays stable.

          Jesus Christ