E: /stoned

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Well yes, but only by a little. It was using ancient measuring techniques which were highly error-prone. Like running from one place to the next and counting the length manually. Shit like that. Still impressively close to the real size!

    • RandomVideos@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      But if the people deciding what the meter was at first were allowed to make errors, why werent the people deciding what the new meter was?

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Like what the other person said, you don’t know the extent of your error until you have a more accurate measuring technique.

        And you don’t just redefine an already-established unit. 😅 Rather, all the things that depend on the meter will be fucked up instead.

      • baduhai@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        But if the people deciding what the meter was at first were allowed to make errors

        It’s not that they were allowed to make errors, it’s more like they made errors and didn’t know any better.

        why werent the people deciding what the new meter was?

        They may very well have made a mistake, and we just haven’t noticed yet.