• glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        To convince people that something happened…

        This isn’t a theoretical, people have been manipulating photos from the start

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          To link back to the original spirit of the post: would that be something that people returning to non-digital photography immediatly resort to, considering such individuals would be striving to remove themselves from generated images?

          I’m not afraid to say it: I’d have the technology destroyed and banned tomorrow if I could. Image generation will cause a lot of damage in a near future. Many will have their lives destroyed because of it.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            OP said:

            holy grail of evidence in the age of AI and deepfakes?

            You said basically the same thing:

            hard evidence the image was not tampered with or generated.

            And analog photography is not evidence because it’s easy to fake and that applies to the negatives, too