'We support the work of those who are trying to limit the harm generative AI is doing to videogames and our world, and apologise that Big Walk’s LLM usage may not meet their standards'
I’ve just started to ignore those “AI slop” parrots. There’s nothing you can say to them to change their minds similar to how a religious person believes their religion is the correct one.
If you read the article it’s far from AI slop. There is an important nuanced discussion that we are not having and automatically calling all AI slop is not helpful.
Only an extremist would think that non-extreme position is centralism. You’re already arguing from a position of bad faith. You refuse to accept the possibility that any use of AI can be ethical. Now that’s your choice, but you can’t really expect that to become the majority viewpoint.
I’ve just started to ignore those “AI slop” parrots. There’s nothing you can say to them to change their minds similar to how a religious person believes their religion is the correct one.
If you read the article it’s far from AI slop. There is an important nuanced discussion that we are not having and automatically calling all AI slop is not helpful.
Except the pro-sloppers are more akin to the religious nuts.
Horseshoe theory proven right, yet again.
How so?
Vehemently pro AI: You’re an idiot/luddite/snailcat if you don’t use AI for everything
Vehemently anti-AI: You’re an idiot/thief/anti-art if you use AI at all in any capacity
Nuanced middle ground hated by both: Some AI use is OK, vibing a whole game probably isn’t.
Mhm. Cann you succinctly explain what you think horseshoe theory is? Otherwise this just reads as enlightened centrism tbh.
Only an extremist would think that non-extreme position is centralism. You’re already arguing from a position of bad faith. You refuse to accept the possibility that any use of AI can be ethical. Now that’s your choice, but you can’t really expect that to become the majority viewpoint.
Me, an enlightened centrist: well those are extremist positions and argued in bad faith. Clearly murdering children is sometimes good, actually.
Well of course it depends on the child.
For example if we’d known you were going to grow up to be a disingenuous pillock we could have spared the food resources to raise you.
An actual example of why you have no point by the way.
Centralism isn’t the midpoint between two positions it’s the recognition that two sides can have valid argument but it is almost never the midpoint.
Is an extremist dogwhistle.
No it isn’t, and that’s fascist as fuck to say. Fuck you
Ok so you can’t explain what you mean.
From the pov of an enlightened centrist, I am sure it is.
That’s the most enlightened centrist comment I’ve ever read.