'We support the work of those who are trying to limit the harm generative AI is doing to videogames and our world, and apologise that Big Walk’s LLM usage may not meet their standards'
This is exactly why barely anyone discloses AI use anymore. I use AI sometimes, my colleagues use AI sometimes, everyone I know in the software industry uses Claude in some capacity. But we don’t talk about it in public because it’s become so toxic that you might as well replace a simple AI disclosure with “please witch hunt me and call months of my work vibecoded slop even if it clearly isn’t”
Most people are over AI being used in code but some people aren’t ready for it yet. I give it two years until it’s basically normalized.
The reactionary types tend not to be developers, they tend to be people who don’t really know anything about programming or 3D modelling, or how much annoying boilerplate code you have to type just to get a rectangle on the screen.
Discussion of this topic requires technically minded people, not vague feelings.
This is exactly why barely anyone discloses AI use anymore. I use AI sometimes, my colleagues use AI sometimes, everyone I know in the software industry uses Claude in some capacity. But we don’t talk about it in public because it’s become so toxic that you might as well replace a simple AI disclosure with “please witch hunt me and call months of my work vibecoded slop even if it clearly isn’t”
Most people are over AI being used in code but some people aren’t ready for it yet. I give it two years until it’s basically normalized.
The reactionary types tend not to be developers, they tend to be people who don’t really know anything about programming or 3D modelling, or how much annoying boilerplate code you have to type just to get a rectangle on the screen.
Discussion of this topic requires technically minded people, not vague feelings.