I’m not sure why everyone is so upset about the price.
Because this is a 6~700 dollar machine that is now this price because of Sam Altman and his competing AI cronies having gone full scorched earth on the hardware market for no good reason.
A new branch of people is now confronted with this reality actually affecting them.
It’s significantly less than a gaming rig with similar specs that you can custom build.
Youtube’s full of people that build comprable or better performing machines in this broad price bracket.
There’s obviously more to this steam machine than just performance, but it’s not particularly cheap in any respect.
What I know is that if I walk into my local Micro Center and try to build a comparable machine, I’m getting dangerously close to $3,000.
My current PC is already very close to the Steam Machine’s specifications, and it cost me around $2,500 when I built it back in 2022.
We also live in a time when hardware is more expensive than it has any right to be.
The price-to-performance ratio on this product is acceptable, if not slightly underpowered by today’s standards. But people also need to remember that this is a fully assembled Linux gaming machine that someone can take out of the box, power on, and use immediately.
It’s also worth remembering that traditional consoles are often sold at a loss because manufacturers make their money back through game sales and platform fees. That’s not the business model that Valve is pursuing.
At this point, I honestly think people would have been upset no matter what Valve did. If they priced it higher, people would complain it was too expensive. If they priced it lower, people would complain it wasn’t powerful enough.
That’s the issue with the PC gaming community. A lot of people seem disconnected from how most people actually game.
The most common graphics card on Steam is still the 3060, and the most common resolution is 1080p.
Only a relatively small segment of gamers is chasing 4K at 60 FPS or higher.
The Steam Deck is not a particularly powerful device by modern PC standards, yet it’s proven to be extremely capable for gaming.
So, yes, I see a decent product here. It will work perfectly well for the overwhelming majority of people who are actually going to buy it.
Luckily, you don’t run a business, because dismissing a product simply because it doesn’t cater to the enthusiast minority is a great way to ignore the customers who make up most of the market.
A PS5 pro blows this out of the water for a lower price. This thing has less performance than a base PS5.
Valve targeted a price/performance point that did not exist anymore. They advertised 4k/60FPS, you’re just not getting that with this box. They ended up targeting 1080p. As component prices got more expensive they ended up compromising on performance to keep the cost somewhat manageable, but ended up in a very unfavorable part of the price/performance curve. That’s why it’s so underwhelming to people.
You can build an equivalent or more powerful pc for slightly less than this. But if you’re willing to shell out a couple hundred more, you get a multiple of the performance this thing offers. It’s outcompeted on both price and performance.
I was quite hyped to get one of these but I’m not shelling out that money for what you get right now. I’d rather spend a little bit more to get something that will actually last and stay relevant for a few more years.
A PS5 pro blows this out of the water for a lower price
Why everyone us this stupid argument? The PS5 pro cost less because sony will get back the money with the games they sell on the playstation store and the monthly subscription you are forced to pay if you wanna play online
The playstation plus essential is €70 for a year, let’s say you will pay for 5 years, it will be €4350 sum it to the €898 of the console and you get €1248 spent
The steam machine with 2TB is €1359 (or 1428 if you really want the controller) and you can use it forever, run old ass games with emulators, mod games, play pirated games, use it how you want, even for productivity and without any subscription
Do you see why Valve can’t sell hardware for less like Sony does?
This is NOT a console! It’s a PC that offer a plug-n-play expirience for who don’t want to build a PC and then config it!
You just sit on the couch, turn on the gabecube with the controller and it give the same plug and play expirience of a console but with the freedom of a computer, you won’t spend 5/10 minutes to find the TV remote, turn on the TV, walk to the computer to turn it on, select the HDMI source on the TV, take a keyboard and a mouse to open steam, and THEN play.
You aren’t the target audience if you don’t care about all this
I’m not sure why everyone is so upset about the price.
It’s a gaming computer with steam on it.
It’s significantly less than a gaming rig with similar specs that you can custom build.
It’s a really good product for the price.
Because this is a 6~700 dollar machine that is now this price because of Sam Altman and his competing AI cronies having gone full scorched earth on the hardware market for no good reason. A new branch of people is now confronted with this reality actually affecting them.
Youtube’s full of people that build comprable or better performing machines in this broad price bracket. There’s obviously more to this steam machine than just performance, but it’s not particularly cheap in any respect.
I’m not concerned with what YouTubers are doing.
What I know is that if I walk into my local Micro Center and try to build a comparable machine, I’m getting dangerously close to $3,000.
My current PC is already very close to the Steam Machine’s specifications, and it cost me around $2,500 when I built it back in 2022.
We also live in a time when hardware is more expensive than it has any right to be.
The price-to-performance ratio on this product is acceptable, if not slightly underpowered by today’s standards. But people also need to remember that this is a fully assembled Linux gaming machine that someone can take out of the box, power on, and use immediately.
It’s also worth remembering that traditional consoles are often sold at a loss because manufacturers make their money back through game sales and platform fees. That’s not the business model that Valve is pursuing.
At this point, I honestly think people would have been upset no matter what Valve did. If they priced it higher, people would complain it was too expensive. If they priced it lower, people would complain it wasn’t powerful enough.
Is it? Capped at 1080p, low power consumption to control heat, but at a performance cost. Overall pretty meh.
That’s the issue with the PC gaming community. A lot of people seem disconnected from how most people actually game.
The most common graphics card on Steam is still the 3060, and the most common resolution is 1080p.
Only a relatively small segment of gamers is chasing 4K at 60 FPS or higher. The Steam Deck is not a particularly powerful device by modern PC standards, yet it’s proven to be extremely capable for gaming.
So, yes, I see a decent product here. It will work perfectly well for the overwhelming majority of people who are actually going to buy it.
Luckily, you don’t run a business, because dismissing a product simply because it doesn’t cater to the enthusiast minority is a great way to ignore the customers who make up most of the market.
A PS5 pro blows this out of the water for a lower price. This thing has less performance than a base PS5.
Valve targeted a price/performance point that did not exist anymore. They advertised 4k/60FPS, you’re just not getting that with this box. They ended up targeting 1080p. As component prices got more expensive they ended up compromising on performance to keep the cost somewhat manageable, but ended up in a very unfavorable part of the price/performance curve. That’s why it’s so underwhelming to people.
You can build an equivalent or more powerful pc for slightly less than this. But if you’re willing to shell out a couple hundred more, you get a multiple of the performance this thing offers. It’s outcompeted on both price and performance.
I was quite hyped to get one of these but I’m not shelling out that money for what you get right now. I’d rather spend a little bit more to get something that will actually last and stay relevant for a few more years.
Why everyone us this stupid argument? The PS5 pro cost less because sony will get back the money with the games they sell on the playstation store and the monthly subscription you are forced to pay if you wanna play online
The playstation plus essential is €70 for a year, let’s say you will pay for 5 years, it will be €4350 sum it to the €898 of the console and you get €1248 spent
The steam machine with 2TB is €1359 (or 1428 if you really want the controller) and you can use it forever, run old ass games with emulators, mod games, play pirated games, use it how you want, even for productivity and without any subscription
Do you see why Valve can’t sell hardware for less like Sony does?
This is NOT a console! It’s a PC that offer a plug-n-play expirience for who don’t want to build a PC and then config it!
You just sit on the couch, turn on the gabecube with the controller and it give the same plug and play expirience of a console but with the freedom of a computer, you won’t spend 5/10 minutes to find the TV remote, turn on the TV, walk to the computer to turn it on, select the HDMI source on the TV, take a keyboard and a mouse to open steam, and THEN play.
You aren’t the target audience if you don’t care about all this
If they wanted to gain market they should have included a AM4 option that matches PS5 price and performance.
Ps5s are sold at a loss.
They could have done the same thing but then again a steam machine isn’t a PS5.
People would immediately abuse that and start buying these up in bulk for reasons other than gaming on them.