• masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      It’s far faster. Ripgrep has to search every file exhaustively at query time. Windows Search indexes every file at write time (or a background job) so the search results are near instantaneous … at least, that’s how it used to work. I don’t know what happened to it over the past 5-10 years.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Everything could do this but sometimes you don’t want to.

          i.e. you’re trading off the background indexing resource usage for instant search results. On a consumer PC where you’re constantly on it and searching for stuff that’s worth it, on a remote server that you’re logging into to bug fix but is normally just running a headless application it may not be.

          • TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            NTFS drives have an index built-in. It’s not fit for search, but it comes with a journal and you can update a search index incrementally. That’s what Voidtools Everything does. It’s very fast and doesn’t need a background index. (I assume modern Linux drive formats can do the same)

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would argue it used to be faster since it was indexed.

      Not going to install win 11 to find out if it’s any good again. But in 7 it was.