sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoMeta wants a child safety bill rewritten to shield it from lawsuits over harm to kidswww.techspot.comexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1383arrow-down11
arrow-up1382arrow-down1external-linkMeta wants a child safety bill rewritten to shield it from lawsuits over harm to kidswww.techspot.comsanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squaresidebro@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up49·3 days agoAlmost like they don’t give a shit if they harm kids
minus-squarerayyy@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·3 days agoIt’s either kids or profits for Zuck. Which is more important?
minus-squareLost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoinsert small mexican girl meme Why not both?
minus-squareNM_Gringo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 days agoOr know that they already have harmed kids.
minus-squaresqueeG@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-23 days agoI’m sure this is partially what these ID laws are about, they know their product is harmful to not just kids but EVERYONE, but they don’t want EVERYONE to stop using it, so what’s the answer? Ban the kids
minus-squareCosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 days agoAlmost like they want to profit by harming kids.
Almost like they don’t give a shit if they harm kids
It’s either kids or profits for Zuck. Which is more important?
insert small mexican girl meme
Why not both?
Or know that they already have harmed kids.
I’m sure this is partially what these ID laws are about, they know their product is harmful to not just kids but EVERYONE, but they don’t want EVERYONE to stop using it, so what’s the answer? Ban the kids
Almost like they want to profit by harming kids.