Whenever I talk to any Democrat supporters, they by-default cheer their Presidents and then I’ve to remind them of their leader’s illegal wars and war crimes. They condemn those acts and they go back to their cheerleading role - Why do they keep forgetting atrocities committed by their leaders? Why do they accept war criminals as their leader?

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Dems don’t care who the leader is. What matters if they’re advancing the agenda. Same reason Republicans cheer on a pedophile rapist.

    • SirActionSack@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      The poor turnout for Hillary and Kamala suggests they actually do have some opinions on who the leader is.

      • Carighan Maconar@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        Yeah americans genuinely would rather have a rapist as a president than a woman, amazing. (jokes aside, you are of course correct that this immediately disproves that theory that people don’t care who the leader is)

        • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Americans would rather vote for someone who lies about being anti war, than a fucking bloodthirsty neoliberal war monger? Weird.

        • Lenin's Dumbbell @lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Between War Criminals and Rapist War criminals, Americans definitely prefer the Rapist War Criminals.

          Don’t get me started on how pathetic it was for the non-rapist war criminals to invite one of the most infamous war criminals to their campaign, instead of being, uk, not war criminals