Here is my two cents on that question
When I fill out a sponsorblock,
I feel like I have comitted an act of civic duty
I feel pride
I hope others feel that too
I want to ***** on the grave of Ivy Lee and Edward Bernays and sponsorblock lets me symbolically do it.
We are participants in an hyperwar and I hope our side win.
Fellow sponsorblocker,
I don’t know who you are,
I don’t know where you are
But can I see you and I am proud of you
Fellow sponsorblocker, I salute you O7
To stop the nasty goblins and their stooges
who constantly besiege our minds and try to infect them
##Is our solemn duty
in this digital hyperwar
To protect the innocent from their vile endeavour
to have less and want more
That’s a money centric worldview.
I don’t think advertisers should be allowed to patron the arts, I think they have infected the art space and this is bad for all of us.
I think people would do better, truer art (even if it were of lower objective quality) by not suffering the incentives and directives of advertising.
I see advertising as a corrupting drug for art. While it creates more bulk I think it has made art worse as a whole.
After the “adpocalypse” where were have destroyed every piece of advertising and cleansed it from the stench of marketing.
This post-advertising world would have more art it in, it would mean more it would be better
Nature abhors a vacuum, the death of advertising centric art would create a fertile space for art that is simply unthinkable at this moment.
Get rid of your moneybrain
Advertising and marketing will not gently let go, we have to exterminate it