Adding to the rant

Like many countries, France has an near infinite number of charging stations, all of which require a different card and paid membership.

All of those companies used state funds to build their infrastructure.

  • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    In North America, there have been several competing standards for years. Manufacturers finally seem to be coalescing around NACS (nee Tesla), but there are still a lot of cars which use CCS (two different types, none of which are the EU CCS), J1772, and CHAdeMO. Adapters abound, but it’s a mess.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah I think it’s mainly North America (us?) that’s the problem.

      However the standards process worked, it created poor choices and was not effective. Twice. At least we’re finally coalescing on a de facto standard, and NACS is better than the previous two choices

      But yeah the app situation is bad. While I appreciated using chargers that use my cars internal ID, and just worked, that clearly doesn’t scale. Now that we’re trying to scale out to general use so we really need credit card readers instead of a plethora of apps.

      Not requiring an app was one of the prerequisites for federal incentive money, but the short-sighted administration retracted that