• RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This was a workman’s comp insurance CEO not a US healthcare CEO. The difference is unlike healthcare insurers, workman’s comp isn’t paid into by the victim and they actually provide some benefit at least in theory.

    • hooferboof@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Except if you ask anyone that’s ever had to deal with workers comp its always too little too late and a mountain of bullshit. Workers comp is arguably even worse than normal health insurance companies to deal with.

      • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        When my mom needed workers comp they had her do x-rays six months later then tried to say it was a six month old preexisting condition.

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Again in theiry the difference is workman’s comp still provides a service whereas other than rent seeking I am not sure what us health insurers do.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          In theory regular insurance provides the same benefits as worker’s comp and the cost of both come out of paychecks one way or the other.

          Worker’s comp is just insurance with even more steps.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Workman’s comp isn’t just covering hospital bills, it also covers lost wages while recovering or retaining if you can’t go back to your old profession.