• Pup Biru@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    generalisations shouldn’t be applied to individuals but often hold true for groups… a non-trivial number of US police officers escalate situations if they aren’t given “respect” and compliance. that is a fact… when applied to a decent period of time, over a city full of US police officers, escalation is all but inevitable: not for any individual, but the group

    • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Availability heuristic. You don’t hear about the thousands more peaceful altercations. The only ones you hear about are the violent ones which, surprise surprise, are more likely to get shown in the media

      • gustofwind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Well yeah but there are wayyy too many violent interactions

        Also during every violent interaction how many “good cops” just stood there and watched?

        40% of cops admit to abusing their partners lmao

        It’s basically safe to assume if someone wants to be or is a cop they’re really just an actual psychotic criminal underneath

          • Machinist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            Fuck the fucking pigs. Guilty until proven innocent at this point. I give game wardens and postal inspectors a pass, I guess.

            I hope most of them die in a fire and it hurts the whole time.

            I had a dear friend who was gang raped by sheriff’s deputies. I reckon that’s just an anecdote.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        that’s not relevant though… in a situation where you only need 1, you only need 1

        and the statement had nothing to do with individual officers, so you can’t apply it to individual officers: the group that is US police officers frequently escalate situations… individual interactions are irrelevant to that statement