The latest Edge Canary version started disabling Manifest V2-based extensions with the following message: “This extension is no longer supported. Microsoft Edge recommends that you remove it.” Although the browser turns off old extensions without asking, you can still make them work by clicking “Manage extension” and toggling it back (you will have to acknowledge another prompt).

At this point, it is not entirely clear what is going on. Google started phasing out Manifest V2 extensions in June 2024, and it has a clear roadmap for the process. Microsoft’s documentation, however, still says “TBD,” so the exact dates are not known yet. This leads to some speculating about the situation being one of “unexpected changes” coming from Chromium. Either way, sooner or later, Microsoft will ditch MV2-based extensions, so get ready as we wait for Microsoft to shine some light on its plans.

Another thing worth noting is that the change does not appear to be affecting Edge’s stable release or Beta/Dev Channels. For now, only Canary versions disable uBlock Origin and other MV2 extensions, leaving users a way to toggle them back on. Also, the uBlock Origin is still available in the Edge Add-ons store

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        We need a truly FOSS browser that developed and maintained by the community. Librewolf isn’t it unless it fully forks away from Mozilla. We need a new engine and we just don’t have one yet.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      90% of people and corporations are either using Edge or Chrome and since there’s essentially no difference between the two they are equally bad. We’re back to a browser mono-culture, just like in the bad old days of Internet Explorer.

      • Naich@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not that bad yet. FF works on pretty much any site that’s not demonstrating some sort of bleeding edge fuckery. I haven’t seen a “best viewed in Chrome” for a decade or two.

        Hopefully this sort of enshittification will drive more people to use other browsers.

    • Waldschrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well, Firefox tries really hard to go to shit as well with their new Privacy Policy and their first ever Terms of Service.

    • intelisense@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I use Firefox for most things, but Google Meet maxes out all my CPUs if I use Firefox. Any kind of screen sharing kills it. Suggestions on how I can get video encoding working greatly appreciated… Intel Xe graphics.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Right, you don’t need extensions, because you don’t need customization, because what you need is what we the corp say you need.

    I think Web as it exists is a failed branch of evolution.

    A networked (solved) hypertext (solved) document (solved) system - yes. A networked hypertext system with one or two unbelievably complex clients, where only enormous corps have enough resources to change something, - no. One can add steps - E2E encryption, dynamic services, scripts, all not requiring a monolithic piece of nonsense.

    BTW, those hating Flash, I hope, do realize that its proper, paradigm-abiding replacement would be a FOSS plugin with similar goal, not what we have.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, if you didn’t see that writing on the wall you need your eyes testing.

    No Chrome browser will be maintained to keep using Manifest V2.

    Use Firefox.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nooo, it is browser on my workplace! How should I work efficiently without uBlock!?!?

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      My work insists on using it too. Fuck knows why, maybe it’s a security thing? And my personal laptop is constantly nagging me to use edge - it could be the best browser ever and I would still avoid it just because of the pushiness.

      • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It’s a good Chromium based Windows native browser that has integration with your Entra ID account so all your bookmarks / history is automatically synced and users have seamless experience when switching devices. No longer seeing tickets like ″My bookmarks are gone after I reinstalled my PC″ is enough to consider Edge as your company main browser. And the fact that it is part of OS, you do not need to worry about install and patching.

        I prefer Firefox, but from Chromium browsers Edge is really good, you cannot expect companies to suggest something like Vivaldi.

        This is for companies being in M365 ecosystem. If you are in Google then I suppose Chrome would make more sense.

        • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, that’s fair, I thought it would probably be something like that. TBF it’s work, they’re paying me, I’ll use whatever they choose. I won’t have it on my own computer though just because of Microsoft’s hard sell

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        🤭yea, and what are we gonna do against it?

        We manage everything with azure group policies (therefore use all microsoft). we don’t want an extra system to manage the browser of the employees. Maybe corporations are save from that just a while longer than private user 🤔

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Of course, but extra work is required for third party browsers vs just using windows built in browser designed to be managed using entraID / intune.

            Companies don’t like to pay extra.

            • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s no different than controlling add-ons via GPO like we did in the old days of on-prem. No extra cost associated.

                • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Your outsourced IT provider charges for simple configuration changes? That’s a yikes from me. I worked in MSPs for years and those sort of changes were always covered in the standard contract.

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Ok maybe off topic, why does a web browser have to be one of the most complicated software artifacts on earth? So expensive to write and maintain that only a few orgs with huge developer resources can do it?

    What would it look like to start from scratch with a massively simplified standard for specifying UIs, based on all we’ve learned since html/css was invented? A standard that a few developers could implement in a few weeks using off the shelf libraries. Rather than reimplement every bizarre historical detail in html/css, have a new UI layout system that’s simple and consistent, and perhaps more powerful.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Basically browsers are big because they are operating systems for web hosted applications with huge attack surfaces and lots of legacy compatibility requirements amassed over 3 decades.

      A rewrite isn’t the answer. Putting limits on browser functionality is. JavaScript was the turning point IMHO.

      • Engywook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        True. Most of the negative comments about Chromium here are really obtuse. Looks like people feel the need to gain imaginary internet points by praising a mediocre browser made by a misguided Corp. such as Mozilla.

        Save your time and avoid replying here. I wont’ reply back. I’m not interested in arguing. Just block me if you disagree and go on with your life.

        • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Let’s hope that Ladybird be better than Mozilla Firefox.

          I would be curious if Ladybird is successful, maybe Microsoft, Apple or Brave will use it after leaving Chrome and WebKit.

          • Engywook@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Maybe, but even if it happens it’s going to take a lot of time. Let’s wait and see.

          • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You can easily hide crypto stuff (which I do) and Chromium is great, just not Google Chrome, but the actual Chromium.

            • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              the problem with chromium is that because 98% of people use it, google gets to decide how the internet works basically

              • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I get that, but alternatives suck. Firefox doesn’t even support all of the extensions I need.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Me and my colleagues in tech call it the ‘Granny Browser’.

    Either use Firefox/UBlock Origin or Brave. Brave’s native adblock is good enough you don’t need add-ons.