• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If there is no organization, then how can it be revolutionary? Actions do not exist without context. Again, returning to Luigi, there was no revolutionary reason to kill the CEO. I won’t condemn Luigi, but he did not move the movement forward.

    • someoneelse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Returning to Luigi, he definitely didn’t move the general movement forward. As I said, he can only be considered within the context of privatized healthcare and even then as a failed spark. But failing is not the same as not existing, that’s where we disagree.

            • someoneelse@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              For the greater movement no. If a second CEO had been murdered, do you think that there would have been no changes at all in any sense?

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Revolution isn’t any change, change is constant. I don’t think a second random assassination would improve worker positioning and organizing for revolution, nor weaken the bourgeois state.

                • someoneelse@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Again, revolutionary within the scope of health care in the US. There is more than one kind of revolution possible. And if you don’t think that a system that’s causing the death of thousand of people and uncountable amount of pain due to lack of care improves the lives of workers then that’s a different discussion.