• PetterOfCats@mastodon.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      @minorkeys
      all victims would include women who are raising their voices against this. Still waiting on the “other” victims you are inferring. So rather than very much standing against “some” of the victims as you are very openly and plainly doing, perhaps lend your voice to help rather than harm.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s the nature of patriarchy. Women are to be protected while most men are disposable.

      • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It isn’t patriarchy, it’s women protecting each other. Its matriarchy in a patriarchal trenchcoat.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That’s a non-sequitur. A group of people banding together to protect themselves is not automarically an *archy. Nor does it follow they are secretly in control. I think you are describing your own personal reality then the reality at large. Do women really control your life so much that you feel you are not in control of your own life? Can you cite an example for us to analyze?

            • zbyte64@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              If you want to argue then address the first three sentences rebutting your argument. If you want to express your feelings you address the personal. I gave you both options and you chose the latter. Consider me your free internet schizo therapist.