• titanicx@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 days ago

    The new ones corner well. The old ones, well, pull up some of the old top gear episodes where they tested vets on their courses.

    • Dookieman12@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      They handled well for the time they were manufactured. Comparing old cars to new ones like that isn’t really fair. Even a modern Honda Accord could outperform a C3 or older Corvette in every category. The difference in aerodynamics, suspension, and materials technologies, plus computer control, makes that big of a difference.

      Matter of fact, if I remember correctly, a modern Honda Accord Sport has a faster Nurburgring lap time than an R34 Skyline, which was one of the fastest production cars of the 90s. That’s how quickly car technology advances.

      • autriyo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        Also tires, whatever came on a c3 is way worse than modern tires are. Its a huge difference.

        • TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Modern tires and n an older vehicle make a big difference. Never understood why someone would spend more for bias plys, like I appreciate the look but I like to drive too.

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I wasn’t comparing them to a modern vehicle. Even for vehicles of their time they really didn’t corner well. Corvettes were meant and designed to go fast and a straight line but they weren’t designed to corner very well. Not until the newer mid engine ones.