• atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I should be allowed to know if it’s looking at my case. Should be a matter of public record.

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    “Never talk about goblins, gremlins, raccoons, trolls, ogres, pigeons, or other animals or creatures unless it is absolutely and unambiguously relevant

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Even if it worked perfectly… isn’t clerking the way future attorneys and judges are supposed to get experience?

    • egregiousRac@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That’s the fatal flaw with AI. If you can replace the base-level workers in a skilled field, competition will lead to most places doing that. 5-10 years later, the industry has a shortage of mid-level workers.

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Obviously as AI improves at clerking, it gradually works it’s way up the ladder, for a while we’ll have our VIBE lawyers until they can be fully replaced with full AI lawyers, and then repeat the process for judges.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The law’s been blind, (supposedly) but now it’s also brain damaged. Great.