weirdbeardgame@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 day agolet's get controversial with the holiday question's.message-squaremessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up145arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up140arrow-down1message-squarelet's get controversial with the holiday question's.weirdbeardgame@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square88fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareroux2scour@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoIt would be a toast then, you must make the container be around the containee
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up2·18 hours agothere was nothing about that in the rules!
minus-squareroux2scour@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoThe info probably got lost in translation. Container and conatained implies on around the other. In french this sounds obvious, maybe not in english
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoi was assuming it was lost the other way around; surely you are not arguing that open-face sandwiches like smørrebrød are not sandwiches?
minus-squareroux2scour@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoI didn’t knew about smorrebrod until today, and it doesn’t really go in my definition of sandwich, but if you tell me that it is culturally accepted as a sandwich, it would indeed bring more useless and delicious debates to my life
It would be a toast then, you must make the container be around the containee
there was nothing about that in the rules!
The info probably got lost in translation. Container and conatained implies on around the other. In french this sounds obvious, maybe not in english
i was assuming it was lost the other way around; surely you are not arguing that open-face sandwiches like smørrebrød are not sandwiches?
I didn’t knew about smorrebrod until today, and it doesn’t really go in my definition of sandwich, but if you tell me that it is culturally accepted as a sandwich, it would indeed bring more useless and delicious debates to my life