The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    From what I’ve just read, the tech doesn’t seem ready to identify people yet. It can supposedly detect hand gestures, but facial recognition I seriously doubt. But that’s probably just a matter of improving the tech. See this article for more info.

    • Null User Object@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      From OPs linked article…

      In tests involving 197 participants, the researchers said the system identified individuals with nearly 100% accuracy. The recognition remained effective regardless of viewing angle or how the participants walked.

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I can totally believe when it tracks a person it can tell when the same person walks by again later. But matching people with their actual identities would require a database of wifi scan data that simply doesn’t exist yet.

    • obviouspornalt@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      that’s a trivial problem to solve. combine this with a camera for facial recognition in a public space. then you’ve got wifi signature combined with the photo/video for facial recognition. then presumably you can use the WiFi signature anywhere else, even without the camera and be able to identify people.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I was wondering about that. The article didn’t say anything about being able to identify the same person walking past a different router. And I can’t imagine the study didn’t try. So I assume it doesn’t work.