I’m thinking even for cases of like shrinkflation.

I saw an article about potentially cheaper RAM here, so it got me curious if things ever really get better on occasion.

  • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    academic publishing. It used to be monopolized by a couple publishing company with unreasonably high fee for access on both the side of researcher and reader.

    Now, through hard works of the academics and funding from the public, now many publishing company are non-profit governed by working academics. And in many fields, open access has become the default.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      its still paywalled for the person who wants reader, its free if you are in a university either as a student or a faculty.

      • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Not the case with ACM and dagstuhl, but I know other publishers like Springer and IEEE does this. That is why we moved away from them :)

    • ZMoney@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Now, instead of paying a subscription, they charge a one-time several thousand dollar fee to the researcher for open access. Problem solved! Everybody knows those fat cat grad students and post docs have plenty of money to throw away on oat milk lattes.

      • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I don’t think that is the case for ACM and Dagstuhl. ACM used to have this ACM open system where department pay a fixed amount subscription per year depends on the department size.

        Now that all ACM paper is open access, I don’t know if they are still doing that. Dagstulh never had these, as far as I know, hosting articles are extremely cheap.

        These is certainly not the norm everywhere, but our field have already navigated out the swamp of free access, I hope more fields wil.

          • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            I am not disagreeing or attempting to downplay that academic publishing is still bad in many fields. But there are fields that are now out of the dumper fire, so I sm hopeful that other fields can learn from these and escape.

            I also want to highlight the solution that worked is organization, public funding, and academic governance. So if you are unhappy about the situation in the field, maybe it is a good time to organize all your unhappy colleagues and build something new and better :)

    • groet@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wouldn’t call it de-shitified but it is getting better. I think also Anna’s archive and syhub should not be underestimated in their effect. If students and researchers are not dependant on journals to do their work, they are more likely to publish open access.

      • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yes, there are many field that are still struggling, but nowadays most of, if not all, the articles in my domain is published by ACM and Schloss Dagstuhl, both are academic governed non-profit that are full open access (I don’t think author even have the option to close access.

        That being said, fields like medicine, biology, engineering is very much behind. I am very glad my field moved away from publishing with IEEE. They are not necessarily “behind” the entire academia, but certainly way behind my field.