beep@piefed.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoU.S. employers spend roughly $1.7 billion annually on union avoidancewww.epi.orgexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up1149arrow-down10
arrow-up1149arrow-down1external-linkU.S. employers spend roughly $1.7 billion annually on union avoidancewww.epi.orgbeep@piefed.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squareBuffalox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·5 days agoWhich is exactly why unions need to be legally protected. The power balance between employer and employee is not equal.
minus-squarenixFREAK@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·5 days agoUnions need to be mandatory and amended
minus-squarepticrix@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 days agoWhoa there, Nelly. Have you thought about those poor people in the union avoidance industry? You want to take their bread and butter and third homes? What about the GDP, did you think about the GDP?
minus-squarehalcyoncmdr@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days ago What about the GDP, did you think about the GDP? Money actually moving around the economy grows the GDP. Money accumulating at the top actually slows economic expansion.
Which is exactly why unions need to be legally protected.
The power balance between employer and employee is not equal.
Unions need to be mandatory and amended
Whoa there, Nelly. Have you thought about those poor people in the union avoidance industry? You want to take their bread and butter and third homes? What about the GDP, did you think about the GDP?
Money actually moving around the economy grows the GDP. Money accumulating at the top actually slows economic expansion.