amniotic druid@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoIt's actually that simple.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square164fedilinkarrow-up1371arrow-down139cross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
arrow-up1332arrow-down1imageIt's actually that simple.lemmy.worldamniotic druid@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square164fedilinkcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
minus-squareLeomas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 days agoNo, if a person doesn’t want to do something and the other person does something anyway, that breaks consent that second.
minus-squareHrabiaVulpes@europe.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·edit-25 days agoYes, but what if a person decides that while they may have consented originally during the act, they benefit more from saying they have not consented later on? I’m asking about this being quite possibly a profitable endeavor.
minus-squareLeomas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 days agoYou have a delusionaly high opinion of the courts.
minus-squareTriasha@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 days agoCelebrities and the Uber wealthy have to worry about this. The average person does not.
No, if a person doesn’t want to do something and the other person does something anyway, that breaks consent that second.
Yes, but what if a person decides that while they may have consented originally during the act, they benefit more from saying they have not consented later on? I’m asking about this being quite possibly a profitable endeavor.
You have a delusionaly high opinion of the courts.
Celebrities and the Uber wealthy have to worry about this. The average person does not.