• Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    But you’re combining two things that should be understood separately to have an accurate picture of what is happening.

    All I’ve seen about 5 is people complaining about how it looks, “not the original artistic vision” or just generally mocking it as bad. (Which is a personal opinion not a hard fact)

    Nothing is in a vacuum sure, but let’s take the “personal responsibility” discussion around greenhouse emissions as an example, yes ordinary people and their actions contribute, but the vast vast vast majority is NOT and focusing on the least impactful level is not going to move the needle when the bigger issue is things like private jets, corporations ignoring environmental regulation, etc.

    • Vespair@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because, going back to the original metaphor, nobody asked for cinnamon in the first place, so any amount wasted on it is stupid.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Weird because if you check search terms there’s a shitload of people asking “how do I enable dlss” and tons of hobbyist projects for backporting it into games that didn’t have it initially.

        It seems to me a lot of people do actively want it.

        • Vespair@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maybe I’m the one out of my depth, but my understanding is that the objection is not to DLSS overall, but the specific implementation of DLSS 5 and it’s AI-driven focus. I am not claiming nobody is asking for DLSS, I’m claiming nobody is asking for the AI-driven focus of the upcoming iteration.